Impacts of Transport Uncertainty on CO <sub>2</sub> Over North America: Insights From Assessments of Two Global Models With Aircraft and Tower Measurements
Abstract Accurate representation of CO 2 transport is important for reliable flux inversions with global inversion systems. Previous studies have revealed systematic discrepancies between two widely used global transport models, GEOS‐Chem and TM5, in simulated CO 2 distributions at mid‐latitudes. However, the causes of these discrepancies and potential transport biases in the models remain unclear without constraints of intensive measurements. Here, we drive GEOS‐Chem and TM5 with identical surface CO 2 fluxes and perform simulations with and without parameterized convection. By comparing the simulated spatial‐temporal distributions of [CO 2 ] to intensive aircraft and tower measurements collected by the Atmospheric Carbon Transport (ACT)‐America project and NOAA's airborne profiling and tower networks across four seasons, we identify potential transport biases in both models over North America. Model discrepancies in vertical transport produce seasonal‐mean planetary boundary layer (PBL)–free‐troposphere [CO 2 ] differences of up to ∼4 ppm and PBL height differences of ∼100–400 m. In summer, GEOS‐Chem underestimates transport through moist convection but overestimates PBL mixing depth, whereas TM5 exhibits more realistic total vertical mixing (moist convection and PBL depth). In spring and winter, TM5 underestimates PBL mixing while potentially overestimating mixing through moist convection, whereas GEOS‐Chem more accurately represents vertical mixing. These transport biases are likely to contribute to discrepancies in the meridional gradient of zonal‐mean [CO 2 ] and propagate into differences in posterior flux estimates from the OCO‐2 Model Intercomparison Project inversions using the two transport models over North America. Expanded vertically resolved [CO 2 ] measurements beyond North America can further advance the current understanding of transport uncertainties at larger spatial scales.
Authors
- A. R. Jacobson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-3382)
- Li Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-5494)
- Andrew Schuh
- Kenneth J. Davis
Institutions
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- California Air Resources Board (US)
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd044053
- Primary Topic
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration