Abstract TP348: Discharge to Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation with a Nasogastric Feeding Tube Safely Decreases Delays in Discharge and Avoids Unnecessary Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Introduction: AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke recommends PEG placement in patients with persistent inability to swallow safely 2-3 weeks after their stroke, 1 and evidence demonstrated that patients had better functional outcomes when they received feeding through a NGT as compared to a PEG for the first 2-3 weeks. 2 At our stroke center, patients are typically ready for acute inpatient rehab prior to the 2-3 week decision point for PEG placement, but unfortunately there were no AIRs in the state that accepted patients with NG feeding tubes. This prolonged hospitalizations and delayed access to much needed therapies. Collaborating with our affiliated AIR, we developed a multidisciplinary plan to safely care for stroke patients with a NGT in place during the 2-3 week period following acute stroke. Methodology: Based primarily on speech language pathologists’ evaluations, we identified patients who were likely to recover their ability to swallow safely and take in adequate nutrition within three weeks of their stroke and proposed transferring these patients to our affiliated AIR. This included patients who had been cleared for a PO diet but needed supplemental tube feedings to meet nutritional needs and patients who were completely NPO. These patients were then followed by the stroke team NP while at AIR, monitoring patients for NGT related complications, duration of NGT use and placement as well as the possible need for PEG placement in those with persistent oropharyngeal dysphagia. Results: From September, 2023 to May, 2025, we transferred 20 patients to AIR with NGT tubes in place. There were no significant NGT tube related complications. One patient returned to the ED to have their NGT replaced. Three patients were readmitted to the hospital, but none of these readmissions were related to dysphagia, aspiration or the NGT itself. All three readmissions were cleared for a PO diet during the subsequent hospitalization and ultimately returned to AIR. Three patients eventually required a PEG to be placed. The average number of days with an NGT at AIR was 16 days and median was 12 days. Conclusion: It is feasible and safe to send selected patients to AIR with an NGT in use for nutritional feedings in the 2-3 week period following a stroke. In our small sample, we encountered no significant NGT related complications and 85% of the patients ultimately avoided PEG placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp348
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP348: Discharge to Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation with a Nasogastric Feeding Tube Safely Decreases Delays in Discharge and Avoids Unnecessary Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Heather Turner, Keri Johnson
Stroke
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Abstract TP348: Discharge to Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation with a Nasogastric Feeding Tube Safely Decreases Delays in Discharge and Avoids Unnecessary Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Heather Turner, Keri Johnson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke recommends PEG placement in patients with persistent inability to swallow safely 2-3 weeks after their stroke, 1 and evidence demonstrated that patients had better functional outcomes when they received feeding through a NGT as compared to a PEG for the first 2-3 weeks. 2 At our stroke center, patients are typically ready for acute inpatient rehab prior to the 2-3 week decision point for PEG placement, but unfortunately there were no AIRs in the state that accepted patients with NG feeding tubes. This prolonged hospitalizations and delayed access to much needed therapies. Collaborating with our affiliated AIR, we developed a multidisciplinary plan to safely care for stroke patients with a NGT in place during the 2-3 week period following acute stroke. Methodology: Based primarily on speech language pathologists’ evaluations, we identified patients who were likely to recover their ability to swallow safely and take in adequate nutrition within three weeks of their stroke and proposed transferring these patients to our affiliated AIR. This included patients who had been cleared for a PO diet but needed supplemental tube feedings to meet nutritional needs and patients who were completely NPO. These patients were then followed by the stroke team NP while at AIR, monitoring patients for NGT related complications, duration of NGT use and placement as well as the possible need for PEG placement in those with persistent oropharyngeal dysphagia. Results: From September, 2023 to May, 2025, we transferred 20 patients to AIR with NGT tubes in place. There were no significant NGT tube related complications. One patient returned to the ED to have their NGT replaced. Three patients were readmitted to the hospital, but none of these readmissions were related to dysphagia, aspiration or the NGT itself. All three readmissions were cleared for a PO diet during the subsequent hospitalization and ultimately returned to AIR. Three patients eventually required a PEG to be placed. The average number of days with an NGT at AIR was 16 days and median was 12 days. Conclusion: It is feasible and safe to send selected patients to AIR with an NGT in use for nutritional feedings in the 2-3 week period following a stroke. In our small sample, we encountered no significant NGT related complications and 85% of the patients ultimately avoided PEG placement.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
University of Virginia (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.