KIDNEY STONES – WHEN TO USE MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND WHEN TO USE ULTRA-MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY?: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Background: Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques have been developed to reduce the morbidity associated with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) while maintaining high stone clearance. Among these approaches, mini-PCNL and ultra-mini PCNL (UMP) are increasingly used; however, their optimal indications remain incompletely defined. Aims: To review and synthesize current evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and clinical indications of mini-PCNL and UMP in the management of kidney stone disease. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, and international guideline documents addressing mini-PCNL and UMP were included. Evidence was synthesized descriptively with emphasis on stone- and patient-related factors influencing technique selection. Results: Both mini-PCNL and UMP demonstrated high stone-free rates when applied in appropriately selected patients. Mini-PCNL achieved superior stone clearance for larger (15–30 mm), multiple, or high-density renal stones, owing to efficient fragment extraction. UMP was associated with lower perioperative morbidity, reduced bleeding risk, and shorter hospital stay, with optimal outcomes observed in smaller stone burdens. Differences in efficacy between techniques were minimal for stones <15 mm but became more pronounced with increasing stone size and complexity. Conclusions: Mini-PCNL and UMP are complementary techniques in contemporary percutaneous stone surgery. Mini-PCNL is best suited for larger or more complex stones requiring active fragment removal, whereas UMP offers advantages in minimizing invasiveness and accelerating recovery in selected patients. Individualized treatment selection based on stone characteristics, patient factors, and surgical expertise is essential to optimize outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4685
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KIDNEY STONES – WHEN TO USE MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND WHEN TO USE ULTRA-MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY?: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Wiktoria Błaszczyk, Anastasiia D. Holoborodko, Anhelina Loputs, Bartosz Lautenbach et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

KIDNEY STONES – WHEN TO USE MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND WHEN TO USE ULTRA-MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY?: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Wiktoria Błaszczyk, Anastasiia D. Holoborodko, Anhelina Loputs, Bartosz Lautenbach, Ewa Wieczorkiewicz, Agnieszka Pocheć, Eliza Garbacz, Patrycja Stępińska, Klaudia Wojciech, Dariusz Nędza
article en

Abstract

Background: Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques have been developed to reduce the morbidity associated with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) while maintaining high stone clearance. Among these approaches, mini-PCNL and ultra-mini PCNL (UMP) are increasingly used; however, their optimal indications remain incompletely defined. Aims: To review and synthesize current evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and clinical indications of mini-PCNL and UMP in the management of kidney stone disease. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, and international guideline documents addressing mini-PCNL and UMP were included. Evidence was synthesized descriptively with emphasis on stone- and patient-related factors influencing technique selection. Results: Both mini-PCNL and UMP demonstrated high stone-free rates when applied in appropriately selected patients. Mini-PCNL achieved superior stone clearance for larger (15–30 mm), multiple, or high-density renal stones, owing to efficient fragment extraction. UMP was associated with lower perioperative morbidity, reduced bleeding risk, and shorter hospital stay, with optimal outcomes observed in smaller stone burdens. Differences in efficacy between techniques were minimal for stones <15 mm but became more pronounced with increasing stone size and complexity. Conclusions: Mini-PCNL and UMP are complementary techniques in contemporary percutaneous stone surgery. Mini-PCNL is best suited for larger or more complex stones requiring active fragment removal, whereas UMP offers advantages in minimizing invasiveness and accelerating recovery in selected patients. Individualized treatment selection based on stone characteristics, patient factors, and surgical expertise is essential to optimize outcomes.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science(1(49))
Medical University of Lublin (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Jan Kochanowski University (PL), Indiana University Hospital (US), Leibniz Association (DE), Antoni Jurasz University Hospital (PL), Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University (PL), Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Welding (PL), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.