Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes as biomarkers of multiple sclerosis disease progression: A structured literature review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated central nervous system (CNS) disease and a leading cause of disability in young adults. Chronic disability progression is an unmet challenge for persons with MS and an area of interest for the development of biomarkers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a putative technique for the development of MS biomarkers. However, TMS outcomes have not been extensively reviewed as biomarkers of disability progression in MS to date. This structured literature review assessed longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of TMS and disability progression in MS. Of the TMS techniques reviewed, central motor conduction time (CMCT), motor evoked potential (MEP) onset latency, and MEP amplitude demonstrated the best clinical performance as markers of CNS demyelination and neuro-axonal damage. While studies showed notable cross-sectional differences in TMS outcomes between persons with progressive and relapsing MS, these findings were less well-supported by longitudinal studies. Across studies, effect sizes were variable, sensitivity and specificity were underreported, and correlations with disability outcomes were heterogeneous. Studies were limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, lack of standardized disability progression definition and TMS methods, and low reporting of diagnostic accuracy. We found insufficient evidence to presently justify the use of TMS techniques as biomarkers of MS disease progression. Future studies should address current limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2026.107035
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes as biomarkers of multiple sclerosis disease progression: A structured literature review

Basel Mohamed, Sarah Duraid, Nicholas J. Snow, Michelle Ploughman
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes as biomarkers of multiple sclerosis disease progression: A structured literature review

Basel Mohamed, Sarah Duraid, Nicholas J. Snow, Michelle Ploughman
article en

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated central nervous system (CNS) disease and a leading cause of disability in young adults. Chronic disability progression is an unmet challenge for persons with MS and an area of interest for the development of biomarkers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a putative technique for the development of MS biomarkers. However, TMS outcomes have not been extensively reviewed as biomarkers of disability progression in MS to date. This structured literature review assessed longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of TMS and disability progression in MS. Of the TMS techniques reviewed, central motor conduction time (CMCT), motor evoked potential (MEP) onset latency, and MEP amplitude demonstrated the best clinical performance as markers of CNS demyelination and neuro-axonal damage. While studies showed notable cross-sectional differences in TMS outcomes between persons with progressive and relapsing MS, these findings were less well-supported by longitudinal studies. Across studies, effect sizes were variable, sensitivity and specificity were underreported, and correlations with disability outcomes were heterogeneous. Studies were limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, lack of standardized disability progression definition and TMS methods, and low reporting of diagnostic accuracy. We found insufficient evidence to presently justify the use of TMS techniques as biomarkers of MS disease progression. Future studies should address current limitations.

Multiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersVol. 107
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.