From Optimization to Ethical Deliberation: A ConstraintBased Linear Programming Framework for Decision Making in Faith-Based Manufacturing Organizations

Purpose: This study aims to reconceptualize linear programming not merely as a technical optimization tool, but as an analytical framework for ethical deliberation in faith-based manufacturing organizations. Existing operations research literature predominantly emphasizes efficiency and cost minimization, while religious studies often examine ethical values without formal decision models. This study addresses the gap between these domains by exploring how production constraints function simultaneously as operational limits and moral boundaries shaped by religious doctrines and faith-based organizational norms within managerial decision-making. Method: The research employs a quantitative operations research approach through a constraint-based linear programming model of production scheduling. The objective function minimizes production cost, while constraints represent capacity, labor availability, and demand requirements. A representative faith-based manufacturing context is used to illustrate model formulation and solution interpretation. Rather than focusing solely on optimal numerical outcomes, the analysis emphasizes the role of binding constraints as sites of ethical consideration, where managerial decisions must balance efficiency objectives with institutional religious commitments. Findings: The findings reveal that binding constraints exert a decisive influence on production decisions, not only by limiting feasible solutions but also by shaping ethical trade-offs faced by managers. The results indicate that efficiency gains are negotiated within predefined moral boundaries, where certain technically optimal options are constrained by religious commitments. This demonstrates that linear programming models can illuminate how ethical considerations are embedded within operational structures rather than treated as external or abstract norms. Significance: This study contributes to religious-oriented operations research by integrating formal optimization models with ethical analysis grounded in faith-based organizational contexts. By framing constraints as moral as well as technical determinants, the study extends the interpretive scope of linear programming and offers a novel analytical bridge between operations research systems and religious studies. The findings provide meaningful insights for scholars and practitioners seeking to align operational efficiency with religious and ethical accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Religious Studies
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64268/ijors.v1i2.85
Primary Topic
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Optimization to Ethical Deliberation: A ConstraintBased Linear Programming Framework for Decision Making in Faith-Based Manufacturing Organizations

Mustika Mustika, Muh Dahkan Thalib, Nurhayati
Indonesian Journal of Religious Studies
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
article

From Optimization to Ethical Deliberation: A ConstraintBased Linear Programming Framework for Decision Making in Faith-Based Manufacturing Organizations

Mustika Mustika, Muh Dahkan Thalib, Nurhayati
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to reconceptualize linear programming not merely as a technical optimization tool, but as an analytical framework for ethical deliberation in faith-based manufacturing organizations. Existing operations research literature predominantly emphasizes efficiency and cost minimization, while religious studies often examine ethical values without formal decision models. This study addresses the gap between these domains by exploring how production constraints function simultaneously as operational limits and moral boundaries shaped by religious doctrines and faith-based organizational norms within managerial decision-making. Method: The research employs a quantitative operations research approach through a constraint-based linear programming model of production scheduling. The objective function minimizes production cost, while constraints represent capacity, labor availability, and demand requirements. A representative faith-based manufacturing context is used to illustrate model formulation and solution interpretation. Rather than focusing solely on optimal numerical outcomes, the analysis emphasizes the role of binding constraints as sites of ethical consideration, where managerial decisions must balance efficiency objectives with institutional religious commitments. Findings: The findings reveal that binding constraints exert a decisive influence on production decisions, not only by limiting feasible solutions but also by shaping ethical trade-offs faced by managers. The results indicate that efficiency gains are negotiated within predefined moral boundaries, where certain technically optimal options are constrained by religious commitments. This demonstrates that linear programming models can illuminate how ethical considerations are embedded within operational structures rather than treated as external or abstract norms. Significance: This study contributes to religious-oriented operations research by integrating formal optimization models with ethical analysis grounded in faith-based organizational contexts. By framing constraints as moral as well as technical determinants, the study extends the interpretive scope of linear programming and offers a novel analytical bridge between operations research systems and religious studies. The findings provide meaningful insights for scholars and practitioners seeking to align operational efficiency with religious and ethical accountability.

Indonesian Journal of Religious StudiesVol. 1(2)
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.