Abstract WP205: Outcomes for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Undergoing Interhospital Transfers versus Direct Admissions in a Large Urban Health System

Introduction: The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends transferring intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients to centers with multidisciplinary teams for timely, comprehensive management. ICH patients undergoing interhospital transfers (IHT) may face worsened outcomes due to delays and neurological deterioration during IHT. Our health system has a centralized triage and transfer program, Neuroemergencies Management and Transfers (NEMAT), which engages a command center and multidisciplinary teams to improve safety and efficiency. We evaluated outcomes among ICH patients admitted directly via emergency department (ED) versus those who underwent IHT via NEMAT to our comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Methods: Data was obtained from Get With the Guidelines (GWTG) and NEMAT QA databases at Mount Sinai Hospital (1/1/21 to 5/30/25). Outcomes included discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) from premorbid baseline to discharge. Predictor variables were transfer status, sex, age, ICH score, pre-stroke mRS, and in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by transfer status (Fisher’s exact test for discharge, Wilcoxon rank-sum test for LOS, and t-test for mRS change) and with regression models (multinomial for discharge, gamma distribution for LOS, linear model for mRS change). Results: Among 204 ICH patients, 39.7% were transfers, 48% female, median age 62 (IQR 23.5 years), median ICH score 1 (IQR 3), median pre-stroke mRS 0, and 24% deceased. Discharge disposition included 90 to rehabilitation facilities, 53 to home, 49 deceased, 8 to acute care facility, 3 left against medical advice, and 1 to hospice. Median LOS was 12.9 days (IQR 19.6) and mean change in mRS was 2.9 (SD 1.97). Transfer status was not associated with discharge disposition (p>0.9). Transfers had longer LOS (median shift: 5.47 days, p=0.013), but this was not significant after adjusting for sex, age, ICH score, and in-hospital mortality (17.7% increase in LOS, 95% CI: -21.8% to 74.9%, p=0.423). Transfer status was not associated with a change in mRS, in adjusted analysis (β=-0.24, p=0.525). Conclusion: In a health system with a centralized triage and transfers system, interhospital transfer to a CSC was not associated with differences in functional outcomes, discharge disposition, or adjusted hospital stay among ICH patients. Future studies should assess how IHT affects time to definitive intervention and outcomes in different care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp205
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP205: Outcomes for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Undergoing Interhospital Transfers versus Direct Admissions in a Large Urban Health System

John Durbin, Michael F. Waters, C Kellner, John Liang et al.
Stroke
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Abstract WP205: Outcomes for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Undergoing Interhospital Transfers versus Direct Admissions in a Large Urban Health System

John Durbin, Michael F. Waters, C Kellner, John Liang, Dana Klavansky, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu, Cappi Lay, Laura Stein, Connor Davy, Neha S. Dangayach, Haeyoung Baang, Gabriela Keeton, Leslie Melo, Fernanda Carvalho Poyraz, Rmneek Kaur
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends transferring intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients to centers with multidisciplinary teams for timely, comprehensive management. ICH patients undergoing interhospital transfers (IHT) may face worsened outcomes due to delays and neurological deterioration during IHT. Our health system has a centralized triage and transfer program, Neuroemergencies Management and Transfers (NEMAT), which engages a command center and multidisciplinary teams to improve safety and efficiency. We evaluated outcomes among ICH patients admitted directly via emergency department (ED) versus those who underwent IHT via NEMAT to our comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Methods: Data was obtained from Get With the Guidelines (GWTG) and NEMAT QA databases at Mount Sinai Hospital (1/1/21 to 5/30/25). Outcomes included discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) from premorbid baseline to discharge. Predictor variables were transfer status, sex, age, ICH score, pre-stroke mRS, and in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by transfer status (Fisher’s exact test for discharge, Wilcoxon rank-sum test for LOS, and t-test for mRS change) and with regression models (multinomial for discharge, gamma distribution for LOS, linear model for mRS change). Results: Among 204 ICH patients, 39.7% were transfers, 48% female, median age 62 (IQR 23.5 years), median ICH score 1 (IQR 3), median pre-stroke mRS 0, and 24% deceased. Discharge disposition included 90 to rehabilitation facilities, 53 to home, 49 deceased, 8 to acute care facility, 3 left against medical advice, and 1 to hospice. Median LOS was 12.9 days (IQR 19.6) and mean change in mRS was 2.9 (SD 1.97). Transfer status was not associated with discharge disposition (p>0.9). Transfers had longer LOS (median shift: 5.47 days, p=0.013), but this was not significant after adjusting for sex, age, ICH score, and in-hospital mortality (17.7% increase in LOS, 95% CI: -21.8% to 74.9%, p=0.423). Transfer status was not associated with a change in mRS, in adjusted analysis (β=-0.24, p=0.525). Conclusion: In a health system with a centralized triage and transfers system, interhospital transfer to a CSC was not associated with differences in functional outcomes, discharge disposition, or adjusted hospital stay among ICH patients. Future studies should assess how IHT affects time to definitive intervention and outcomes in different care settings.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Mount Sinai Health System (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Mount Sinai Medical Center (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.