A multi-cohort assessment of the polygenic prediction in ADHD treatment response

Pharmacological treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are efficacious and safe; however, substantial interindividual variability in treatment response persists, with many patients experiencing suboptimal outcomes or early discontinuation. Although genetic factors have been proposed as contributors to this variability, clinically actionable predictors remain elusive. Here, we present the first meta-analysis evaluating whether polygenic liability for ADHD and related psychiatric and behavioral-cognitive phenotypes is associated with clinically meaningful response to methylphenidate in 1000 ADHD cases from Norway, Brazil, and Spain assessed in real-world settings. Polygenic scores (PGS) for ADHD, autism, bipolar disorder, educational attainment, major depressive disorder, neuroticism, and schizophrenia were calculated separately for each cohort. Treatment response was assessed using evaluations of global clinical improvement and harmonized by categorizing individuals as responders or non-responders. Cohort-specific associations were combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis. No PGS showed a significant association with treatment response. Effect sizes were small, consistent across cohorts, and characterized by minimal between-study heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses incorporating clinical and treatment-related covariates yielded convergent results. As the first meta-analytic evaluation of polygenic predictors evaluating clinically meaningful ADHD stimulant response, these findings delineate the current limits of PGS in pharmacogenomic applications. Rather than supporting immediate clinical utility, our results highlight key methodological and conceptual constraints, including limited sample sizes, heterogeneous outcome definitions, and the indirect nature of susceptibility-based PGS for predicting treatment response. By mapping these boundaries, this study provides a framework to recalibrate research priorities and guide the next generation of ADHD pharmacogenomic studies toward larger, harmonized, and more informative definitions of treatment response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry Research
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2026.116988
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-cohort assessment of the polygenic prediction in ADHD treatment response

Diego Luiz Rovaris, Christian Fadeuilhe, Pâmela Ferreira da Cunha, María Soler Artigas et al.
Psychiatry Research
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

A multi-cohort assessment of the polygenic prediction in ADHD treatment response

Diego Luiz Rovaris, Christian Fadeuilhe, Pâmela Ferreira da Cunha, María Soler Artigas, Anne Halmøy, Eduarda Pereira Oliveira, Eduardo S. Vitola, Cibele Edom Bandeira, André Høberg, Jan Haavik, Pau Carabi Gassol, Montse Corrales, Natalia Llonga, Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga, Bruna S. da Silva, Luis A. Rohde, Vanesa Richart, Eugenio H. Grevet, Maria Gorete Ramos Tavares, Astri J. Lundervold, Claiton H.D. Bau
article en

Abstract

Pharmacological treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are efficacious and safe; however, substantial interindividual variability in treatment response persists, with many patients experiencing suboptimal outcomes or early discontinuation. Although genetic factors have been proposed as contributors to this variability, clinically actionable predictors remain elusive. Here, we present the first meta-analysis evaluating whether polygenic liability for ADHD and related psychiatric and behavioral-cognitive phenotypes is associated with clinically meaningful response to methylphenidate in 1000 ADHD cases from Norway, Brazil, and Spain assessed in real-world settings. Polygenic scores (PGS) for ADHD, autism, bipolar disorder, educational attainment, major depressive disorder, neuroticism, and schizophrenia were calculated separately for each cohort. Treatment response was assessed using evaluations of global clinical improvement and harmonized by categorizing individuals as responders or non-responders. Cohort-specific associations were combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis. No PGS showed a significant association with treatment response. Effect sizes were small, consistent across cohorts, and characterized by minimal between-study heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses incorporating clinical and treatment-related covariates yielded convergent results. As the first meta-analytic evaluation of polygenic predictors evaluating clinically meaningful ADHD stimulant response, these findings delineate the current limits of PGS in pharmacogenomic applications. Rather than supporting immediate clinical utility, our results highlight key methodological and conceptual constraints, including limited sample sizes, heterogeneous outcome definitions, and the indirect nature of susceptibility-based PGS for predicting treatment response. By mapping these boundaries, this study provides a framework to recalibrate research priorities and guide the next generation of ADHD pharmacogenomic studies toward larger, harmonized, and more informative definitions of treatment response.

Psychiatry ResearchVol. 358
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Universidade Brasil (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.