Abstract TP166: The Effect of Race and Socioeconomic Status on End of Life Care

Introduction: Patients from minority racial backgrounds and lower socioeconomic status (SES) often have greater medical mistrust, which may influence end-of-life care decisions including palliative care use and code status. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2016–2021) was retrospectively queried to identify patients with an acute ischemic stroke. Patients were stratified by code status and palliative care consultation. Race was dichotomized as either white or non-white. The primary outcomes included the odds of a patient being seen by palliative care, and odds of a patient having a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status. Primary outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and margins plots adjusted for key clinical and demographic covariates. Secondary outcomes included a non-survey weighted mediation analysis and comparisons of mean NIHSS scores among patients receiving palliative care and those with DNR orders, stratified by race and income quartile. Results: Among 1,313,860 patients, 82,550 (6.28%) had palliative care consultation, and 182,730 (13.9%) had documented DNR status. Of the sample, 896,405 (68.2%) were white and 417,455 (31.8%) non-white; 392,075 (29.8%) were in the lowest and 261,425 (19.9%) were in the highest income quartile. White patients had lower mean NIHSS scores for both palliative care consultation (16.6 vs 17.7, p < 0.001) and DNR status (11.5 vs 14.4, p < 0.001). Similarly, those in the highest income quartile had lower mean NIHSS scores for palliative care consultation (16.3 vs 17.4, p < 0.001) and DNR status (11.2 vs 13.3, p < 0.001). In the logistic regression models, patients from the lowest income quartile had lower odds of palliative care consultation (OR 0.87 95%CI 0.82-0.92, p<0.001) and DNR status (OR 0.75 95%CI 0.72-0.78, p<0.001) compared to those from the highest income quartile. Additionally, patients who were non-white had lower odds of being seen by palliative care (OR 0.63 95%CI 0.60-0.66, p<0.001) and having a DNR code status (OR 0.52 95%CI 0.50-0.54, p<0.001) compared white patients. The mediation analysis showed that increasing NIHSS increased the likelihood of a patient having a DNR status (total effect = 13.73; 95% CI: 12.18-15.47, p < 0.001), with 33.4% of this effect mediated by palliative care. Conclusions: These findings highlight disparities in end-of-life care among non-white, lower SES patients and underscore the need for more nuanced goals-of-care discussions in these populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp166
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP166: The Effect of Race and Socioeconomic Status on End of Life Care

James Ernest Siegler, Elena Badillo Goicoechea, Manisha Koneru, Karan Patel
Stroke
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Abstract TP166: The Effect of Race and Socioeconomic Status on End of Life Care

James Ernest Siegler, Elena Badillo Goicoechea, Manisha Koneru, Karan Patel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients from minority racial backgrounds and lower socioeconomic status (SES) often have greater medical mistrust, which may influence end-of-life care decisions including palliative care use and code status. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2016–2021) was retrospectively queried to identify patients with an acute ischemic stroke. Patients were stratified by code status and palliative care consultation. Race was dichotomized as either white or non-white. The primary outcomes included the odds of a patient being seen by palliative care, and odds of a patient having a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status. Primary outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and margins plots adjusted for key clinical and demographic covariates. Secondary outcomes included a non-survey weighted mediation analysis and comparisons of mean NIHSS scores among patients receiving palliative care and those with DNR orders, stratified by race and income quartile. Results: Among 1,313,860 patients, 82,550 (6.28%) had palliative care consultation, and 182,730 (13.9%) had documented DNR status. Of the sample, 896,405 (68.2%) were white and 417,455 (31.8%) non-white; 392,075 (29.8%) were in the lowest and 261,425 (19.9%) were in the highest income quartile. White patients had lower mean NIHSS scores for both palliative care consultation (16.6 vs 17.7, p < 0.001) and DNR status (11.5 vs 14.4, p < 0.001). Similarly, those in the highest income quartile had lower mean NIHSS scores for palliative care consultation (16.3 vs 17.4, p < 0.001) and DNR status (11.2 vs 13.3, p < 0.001). In the logistic regression models, patients from the lowest income quartile had lower odds of palliative care consultation (OR 0.87 95%CI 0.82-0.92, p<0.001) and DNR status (OR 0.75 95%CI 0.72-0.78, p<0.001) compared to those from the highest income quartile. Additionally, patients who were non-white had lower odds of being seen by palliative care (OR 0.63 95%CI 0.60-0.66, p<0.001) and having a DNR code status (OR 0.52 95%CI 0.50-0.54, p<0.001) compared white patients. The mediation analysis showed that increasing NIHSS increased the likelihood of a patient having a DNR status (total effect = 13.73; 95% CI: 12.18-15.47, p < 0.001), with 33.4% of this effect mediated by palliative care. Conclusions: These findings highlight disparities in end-of-life care among non-white, lower SES patients and underscore the need for more nuanced goals-of-care discussions in these populations.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Vanderbilt University (US), University of Chicago (US), Cooper University Health Care (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.