Abstract A040: Clinical outcomes of DOACs versus warfarin for ischemic stroke caused by left ventricular thrombus: a retrospective single-center study

Introduction: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a leading etiology of cardioembolic stroke, with early appropriate anticoagulation therapy essential. However, there is lack of robust evidence comparing warfarin against direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents, and the choice of stroke prevention therapy in LVT patients remains based on the personal choice of the individual patient and physician. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the relative clinical outcomes of warfarin and DOACs through a comprehensive review of LVT patients with stroke who have been treated with either agent. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients treated for ischemic stroke secondary to LVT at our institution between 9/2017 and 12/2024. Patients were included if they were anticoagulated with either warfarin or a DOAC and had follow-up cardiac imaging to assess thrombus resolution within 6 months of LVT diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulation prior to LVT diagnosis. Statistical analysis utilized descriptive statistics, t-tests, Mann-whitney tests, and chi-square tests. An alpha level of 0.05 was used to denote statistical significance. Results: Patient demographics and vascular or cardiac risk factors at time of diagnosis did not predict anticoagulant usage type (Table 1). Thrombus resolution increased across the 1-, 3-, and 6-month time points, and 79% of patients achieved resolution by 6 months (Table 2). LVEF also increased across time points, suggesting clinical improvement. Five patients were switched from warfarin to a DOAC over the 6-month period. There was no statistically significant difference in thrombus resolution rates between warfarin, apixaban, and rivaroxaban use at initial diagnosis (p = 0.6) (Table 3). However, thrombus resolution was associated with DOAC use at 6 month follow-up (p = 0.07). Warfarin use trended towards a higher rate of complications, with 27.3% of patients experiencing complications compared to 3.8% among DOAC patients with overall numbers too small to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: These findings suggest that DOACs are non-inferior to warfarin for resolution of LVT by 6 months. Warfarin may be associated with greater complication risk within this time period and more difficulties for patient adherence. These factors should be taken into consideration when selecting an anticoagulant agent for patients diagnosed with LVT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a040
Primary Topic
Cardiac tumors and thrombi
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A040: Clinical outcomes of DOACs versus warfarin for ischemic stroke caused by left ventricular thrombus: a retrospective single-center study

S. Nguyen, Josephine L. Martin, Faraz Behzadi, Jasmine Zhang et al.
Stroke
Cardiac tumors and thrombi
article

Abstract A040: Clinical outcomes of DOACs versus warfarin for ischemic stroke caused by left ventricular thrombus: a retrospective single-center study

S. Nguyen, Josephine L. Martin, Faraz Behzadi, Jasmine Zhang, Brigham Harrison, Judy Dawod
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a leading etiology of cardioembolic stroke, with early appropriate anticoagulation therapy essential. However, there is lack of robust evidence comparing warfarin against direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents, and the choice of stroke prevention therapy in LVT patients remains based on the personal choice of the individual patient and physician. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the relative clinical outcomes of warfarin and DOACs through a comprehensive review of LVT patients with stroke who have been treated with either agent. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients treated for ischemic stroke secondary to LVT at our institution between 9/2017 and 12/2024. Patients were included if they were anticoagulated with either warfarin or a DOAC and had follow-up cardiac imaging to assess thrombus resolution within 6 months of LVT diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulation prior to LVT diagnosis. Statistical analysis utilized descriptive statistics, t-tests, Mann-whitney tests, and chi-square tests. An alpha level of 0.05 was used to denote statistical significance. Results: Patient demographics and vascular or cardiac risk factors at time of diagnosis did not predict anticoagulant usage type (Table 1). Thrombus resolution increased across the 1-, 3-, and 6-month time points, and 79% of patients achieved resolution by 6 months (Table 2). LVEF also increased across time points, suggesting clinical improvement. Five patients were switched from warfarin to a DOAC over the 6-month period. There was no statistically significant difference in thrombus resolution rates between warfarin, apixaban, and rivaroxaban use at initial diagnosis (p = 0.6) (Table 3). However, thrombus resolution was associated with DOAC use at 6 month follow-up (p = 0.07). Warfarin use trended towards a higher rate of complications, with 27.3% of patients experiencing complications compared to 3.8% among DOAC patients with overall numbers too small to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: These findings suggest that DOACs are non-inferior to warfarin for resolution of LVT by 6 months. Warfarin may be associated with greater complication risk within this time period and more difficulties for patient adherence. These factors should be taken into consideration when selecting an anticoagulant agent for patients diagnosed with LVT.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
University of Arizona (US), Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiac tumors and thrombi
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.