Efficacy of pegfilgrastim in preventing febrile neutropenia during DCF chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundEsophageal cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy being a standard treatment option for locally advanced disease. However, DCF is associated with a high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), a serious complication that can lead to treatment delays, hospitalizations, and increased morbidity. Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is recommended for FN prevention, but its efficacy in esophageal cancer patients receiving DCF chemotherapy remains unclear.MethodsA systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science identified eligible studies. Retrospective and prospective studies comparing prophylactic pegfilgrastim with placebo or no G-CSF in patients undergoing DCF therapy were included. Eight reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The extracted data were then verified by two additional reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled effect sizes.ResultsPooled analysis showed that <b>pegfilgrastim significantly reduced FN incidence</b> (OR = <b>0.283</b>, 95% CI: <b>0.102-0.782</b>, <b>p</b> <b>=</b> <b>0.015</b>). FN rates ranged from <b>3.3% to 30.8%</b> in the pegfilgrastim group versus <b>26.7% to 60.6%</b> in the control group. Pegfilgrastim was also associated with <b>lower rates of severe neutropenia and shorter hospital stays</b>, with no significant increase in adverse events.ConclusionsIn our study, Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis significantly reduces FN risk, severe neutropenia, and hospital stays in esophageal cancer patients receiving DCF chemotherapy, without increasing major complications. These findings support its routine use in this population, though further prospective randomized trials are needed to optimize dosing strategies and confirm long-term benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261416090
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of pegfilgrastim in preventing febrile neutropenia during DCF chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ahmed Hussein, Khaled Hemdan, Mohammad Shehata, Ziad Elmezayen et al.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Efficacy of pegfilgrastim in preventing febrile neutropenia during DCF chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ahmed Hussein, Khaled Hemdan, Mohammad Shehata, Ziad Elmezayen, Ahmed Oun, Ali Elghareab, Rana Mohamed El Tabakh, Alaa Abdelaziz Ellethey, Amr Mahmoud Yousef
article en

Abstract

BackgroundEsophageal cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy being a standard treatment option for locally advanced disease. However, DCF is associated with a high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), a serious complication that can lead to treatment delays, hospitalizations, and increased morbidity. Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is recommended for FN prevention, but its efficacy in esophageal cancer patients receiving DCF chemotherapy remains unclear.MethodsA systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science identified eligible studies. Retrospective and prospective studies comparing prophylactic pegfilgrastim with placebo or no G-CSF in patients undergoing DCF therapy were included. Eight reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The extracted data were then verified by two additional reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled effect sizes.ResultsPooled analysis showed that <b>pegfilgrastim significantly reduced FN incidence</b> (OR = <b>0.283</b>, 95% CI: <b>0.102-0.782</b>, <b>p</b> <b>=</b> <b>0.015</b>). FN rates ranged from <b>3.3% to 30.8%</b> in the pegfilgrastim group versus <b>26.7% to 60.6%</b> in the control group. Pegfilgrastim was also associated with <b>lower rates of severe neutropenia and shorter hospital stays</b>, with no significant increase in adverse events.ConclusionsIn our study, Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis significantly reduces FN risk, severe neutropenia, and hospital stays in esophageal cancer patients receiving DCF chemotherapy, without increasing major complications. These findings support its routine use in this population, though further prospective randomized trials are needed to optimize dosing strategies and confirm long-term benefits.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Benha University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Modern University for Information and Technology (EG), Al-Azhar University (ID), Al Azhar University (QA), October 6 University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.