Evaluating the methodological suitability of partial dependence plots and Shapley additive explanations for population-level interpretation of machine learning models in total joint arthroplasty
PDPs appear more methodologically appropriate than SHAP for population-level clinical guideline development, offering actionable dose-response relationships and population risk thresholds that SHAP's individualized attribution framework cannot provide. The dominance of interaction effects among the most influential predictors validates that PDPs accurately capture complementary relationships while presenting them in a format directly applicable to evidence-based perioperative protocols and institutional quality improvement initiatives. Video Abstract.
Authors
- Christopher David Hamad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-9857)
- Brandon S. Gettleman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-9289)
- Alexander B. Christ (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-5762)
- Alexandra I. Stavrakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-7650)
- Ezekiel Dingle
- Sumin Jeong
- Kole Joachim
- Amanda Perrotta
- Adrian Lin
- Othneil Sparks
Institutions
- West Los Angeles College (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
- VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Arthroplasty
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00360-9
- Primary Topic
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00