Abstract A099: Geospatial Analysis to Determine Optimal Distribution of Mobile Stroke Units

Background: Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) can significantly improve the outcomes of stroke treatment by enabling faster intravenous thrombolysis. However, they are costly and the optimal deployment strategies remain unclear, particularly for rural and underserved populations. Objective: To use geospatial analysis to determine the optimal geographic distribution of MSUs in Texas, with the aim of maximizing coverage of stroke patients and targeting rural, socially vulnerable and minority populations. Methods: We conducted a statewide geospatial analysis in Texas using publicly available data, including CDC PLACES, Social Vulnerability Index, Rural-Urban Commuting Area (codes, and the Texas Department of State Health Services stroke facility database. Level-I and II stroke centers were geocoded, and drive-time buffers (30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes) around these centers were modeled using ArcGIS Pro. MSU rendezvous points with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) units were assumed to be located halfway between rural stroke locations and stroke centers. Coverage was compared against a baseline 30-minute EMS transport to all stroke centers. Results: We identified fourteen optimal MSU locations (11 Level I and 3 Level II centers) in Texas. Using an 180-minute drive time radius (with a 90-minute rendezvous time), it was estimated that approximately 741,852 stroke patients (99.1% of all stroke patients in Texas) could receive treatment within three hours. This represented a 16.6% increase compared to the baseline EMS scenario. Notably, coverage for rural stroke patients increased by 279%. Using a 120-minute buffer increased treatment availability by 12.3% overall, and by 232% for rural patients. While the 60-minute buffer showed no net increase in patients treated, it enabled 600,101 individuals already covered by EMS to receive care more quickly. Conclusions: Geospatial modelling shows that the strategic deployment of mobile stroke units (MSUs) could greatly improve stroke treatment accessibility and outcomes across Texas, particularly for rural and underserved populations. These findings provide health policymakers with a scalable approach to optimizing MSU placement and reducing disparities in stroke care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a099
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A099: Geospatial Analysis to Determine Optimal Distribution of Mobile Stroke Units

Ryan Ramphul, James Grotta, Yanchen Liu
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract A099: Geospatial Analysis to Determine Optimal Distribution of Mobile Stroke Units

Ryan Ramphul, James Grotta, Yanchen Liu
article en

Abstract

Background: Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) can significantly improve the outcomes of stroke treatment by enabling faster intravenous thrombolysis. However, they are costly and the optimal deployment strategies remain unclear, particularly for rural and underserved populations. Objective: To use geospatial analysis to determine the optimal geographic distribution of MSUs in Texas, with the aim of maximizing coverage of stroke patients and targeting rural, socially vulnerable and minority populations. Methods: We conducted a statewide geospatial analysis in Texas using publicly available data, including CDC PLACES, Social Vulnerability Index, Rural-Urban Commuting Area (codes, and the Texas Department of State Health Services stroke facility database. Level-I and II stroke centers were geocoded, and drive-time buffers (30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes) around these centers were modeled using ArcGIS Pro. MSU rendezvous points with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) units were assumed to be located halfway between rural stroke locations and stroke centers. Coverage was compared against a baseline 30-minute EMS transport to all stroke centers. Results: We identified fourteen optimal MSU locations (11 Level I and 3 Level II centers) in Texas. Using an 180-minute drive time radius (with a 90-minute rendezvous time), it was estimated that approximately 741,852 stroke patients (99.1% of all stroke patients in Texas) could receive treatment within three hours. This represented a 16.6% increase compared to the baseline EMS scenario. Notably, coverage for rural stroke patients increased by 279%. Using a 120-minute buffer increased treatment availability by 12.3% overall, and by 232% for rural patients. While the 60-minute buffer showed no net increase in patients treated, it enabled 600,101 individuals already covered by EMS to receive care more quickly. Conclusions: Geospatial modelling shows that the strategic deployment of mobile stroke units (MSUs) could greatly improve stroke treatment accessibility and outcomes across Texas, particularly for rural and underserved populations. These findings provide health policymakers with a scalable approach to optimizing MSU placement and reducing disparities in stroke care delivery.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Memorial Hermann (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.