The invisible copilot? Assessing task engagement and team dynamics in a virtual flight environment using eye-tracking metrics

Gaze behavior represents a vital predictor of flight performance in pilots operating an aircraft. However, its role in collaborative settings with a copilot has been largely disregarded. Our study addressed this gap by simulating a flight environment with role division into a pilot flying (PF) and pilot monitoring (PM). Analyses of linear mixed-effects models revealed that different eye-tracking metrics significantly differed between the PF and the PM. Additionally, classification analysis revealed that these eye-tracking metrices were suitable for discerning between PF and PM with high predictive accuracy (97%) and precision (97%). We discuss implications for a role-based user state diagnosis for adaptive assistance system design in the cockpit, thereby advancing aviation safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283314
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The invisible copilot? Assessing task engagement and team dynamics in a virtual flight environment using eye-tracking metrics

Yannik Hilla, Sophie-Marie Stasch, Wolfgang Mack
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The invisible copilot? Assessing task engagement and team dynamics in a virtual flight environment using eye-tracking metrics

Yannik Hilla, Sophie-Marie Stasch, Wolfgang Mack
article en

Abstract

Gaze behavior represents a vital predictor of flight performance in pilots operating an aircraft. However, its role in collaborative settings with a copilot has been largely disregarded. Our study addressed this gap by simulating a flight environment with role division into a pilot flying (PF) and pilot monitoring (PM). Analyses of linear mixed-effects models revealed that different eye-tracking metrics significantly differed between the PF and the PM. Additionally, classification analysis revealed that these eye-tracking metrices were suitable for discerning between PF and PM with high predictive accuracy (97%) and precision (97%). We discuss implications for a role-based user state diagnosis for adaptive assistance system design in the cockpit, thereby advancing aviation safety.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The invisible copilot? Assessing task engagement and team dynamics in a virtual flight environment using eye-tracking metrics — Yannik Hilla, Sophie-Marie Stasch, et al. · Universität Zürich, ZORA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS