Palbociclib Capsule: A Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions to Compare Two Formulations

<b>Background:</b> Globally, breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed neoplasm among women, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases reported in 2022. Treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer includes aromatase inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the bioequivalence and tolerability of two palbociclib capsule formulations to support the regulatory approval of a branded generic product in Latin America countries. <b>Methods:</b> Healthy participants were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, single-dose study using a two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover design. Study participants received a single-dose test product, a palbociclib 125 mg capsule (Laboratório LKM S.A., Argentina), and a reference product, an Ibrance<sup>®</sup> 125 mg capsule (Pfizer Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH), under fed conditions separated by a 14-day washout period. Blood samples were obtained at scheduled intervals over a 72 h period following administration, and the palbociclib plasma concentrations were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed via non-compartmental analysis methods. A total of 52 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 50 subjects completed the study. <b>Results:</b> The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-72</sub> were 107.07% (101.98-112.42) and 109.77% (106.51-113.13), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both formulations were well-tolerated in healthy subjects. In accordance with regulatory standards, bioequivalence between the test formulation and the reference product was successfully demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18020175
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palbociclib Capsule: A Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions to Compare Two Formulations

Maira Eduarda Zanin, Mélanie Groleau, Jessé Moisan, Oscar A. Gonzalez et al.
Pharmaceutics
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Palbociclib Capsule: A Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions to Compare Two Formulations

Maira Eduarda Zanin, Mélanie Groleau, Jessé Moisan, Oscar A. Gonzalez, Gilberto Carlos Ruggiero Bernasconi, Thaís Pereira Vespasiano, Marcelo Gomes Davanço, Marcia Aparecida Antonio, Milesa Sarmiento
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Globally, breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed neoplasm among women, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases reported in 2022. Treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer includes aromatase inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the bioequivalence and tolerability of two palbociclib capsule formulations to support the regulatory approval of a branded generic product in Latin America countries. <b>Methods:</b> Healthy participants were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, single-dose study using a two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover design. Study participants received a single-dose test product, a palbociclib 125 mg capsule (Laboratório LKM S.A., Argentina), and a reference product, an Ibrance<sup>®</sup> 125 mg capsule (Pfizer Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH), under fed conditions separated by a 14-day washout period. Blood samples were obtained at scheduled intervals over a 72 h period following administration, and the palbociclib plasma concentrations were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed via non-compartmental analysis methods. A total of 52 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 50 subjects completed the study. <b>Results:</b> The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-72</sub> were 107.07% (101.98-112.42) and 109.77% (106.51-113.13), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both formulations were well-tolerated in healthy subjects. In accordance with regulatory standards, bioequivalence between the test formulation and the reference product was successfully demonstrated.

PharmaceuticsVol. 18(2)
Unidade Integrada de Farmacologia e Gastroenterologia (BR), Therapeutics Clinical Research (US), General Electric (Argentina) (AR), Aegera Therapeutics (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.