Development of the SCI-BodyMap: Measuring Mental Body Representations in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury

There is evidence that adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) have deficits in mental body representations (e.g., altered visuospatial body maps and reduced body awareness), due to the diminished or lack of sensory information reaching the brain. These mental body representation deficits are important and need to be quantified, because they can impact daily functioning and they are associated with neuropathic pain. The currently available evaluation scales measure certain aspects of mental body representations with few having been assessed in adults with spinal cord injury. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no scales have been developed specifically for adults with spinal cord injury. Therefore, to address this gap, we completed two aims. First, we developed a novel evaluation scale (the SCI-BodyMap) to measure SCI-specific deficits in mental body representations. Second, we assessed the psychometric properties of inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, with the Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire, the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2, and the Numeric pain rating scale. We also assessed feasibility, utility, and face validity with the QQ-10. We found good to excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability, with the exception of two items showing moderate test-retest reliability. We did not find any correlations between the SCI-BodyMap with the Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire or the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 and found fair correlations between high levels of neuropathic pain on the Numeric pain rating scale with highest level of neuropathic pain on the SCI-BodyMap. The scale proved to have high feasibility, utility, and face validity. Once more psychometric analyses are performed in a bigger sample, the SCI-BodyMap could be recommended for use in research and in the clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.23.26343891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the SCI-BodyMap: Measuring Mental Body Representations in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury

Daniele De Patre, Sara Bottale, Marina Zernitz, Ann Van de Winckel et al.
1 citations
medRxiv
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
36.85
article

Development of the SCI-BodyMap: Measuring Mental Body Representations in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury

Daniele De Patre, Sara Bottale, Marina Zernitz, Ann Van de Winckel, Sydney Carpentier, I Grimaldi, Nicole Cenci, Mauro Cracchiolo, Julian Pablo Gorosito, Bianca Polinelli, Fortunata Romeo, Jacquelyn Sinner, Janna Neher, Marco Rigoni, Mara Melo, Leena Rapacz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is evidence that adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) have deficits in mental body representations (e.g., altered visuospatial body maps and reduced body awareness), due to the diminished or lack of sensory information reaching the brain. These mental body representation deficits are important and need to be quantified, because they can impact daily functioning and they are associated with neuropathic pain. The currently available evaluation scales measure certain aspects of mental body representations with few having been assessed in adults with spinal cord injury. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no scales have been developed specifically for adults with spinal cord injury. Therefore, to address this gap, we completed two aims. First, we developed a novel evaluation scale (the SCI-BodyMap) to measure SCI-specific deficits in mental body representations. Second, we assessed the psychometric properties of inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, with the Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire, the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2, and the Numeric pain rating scale. We also assessed feasibility, utility, and face validity with the QQ-10. We found good to excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability, with the exception of two items showing moderate test-retest reliability. We did not find any correlations between the SCI-BodyMap with the Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire or the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 and found fair correlations between high levels of neuropathic pain on the Numeric pain rating scale with highest level of neuropathic pain on the SCI-BodyMap. The scale proved to have high feasibility, utility, and face validity. Once more psychometric analyses are performed in a bigger sample, the SCI-BodyMap could be recommended for use in research and in the clinic.

medRxiv
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), Institute for Transfusion Medicine (US), Instituto ABCD (BR), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), Institute of Neurological Sciences (IT), Villa Pineta Hospital (IT)
University of Minnesota, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
36.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.