Histologic mimics of urothelial carcinoma

Conventional urothelial carcinoma in its invasive form has a relatively nonspecific morphologic description, frequently described as nests of epithelial cells containing hyperchromatic and pleomorphic nuclei, with readily identified mitotic figures, and moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm, infiltrating as irregular nests, single cells or solid sheets. The presence of a noninvasive papillary or flat component (urothelial carcinoma in situ), combined with the clinical presentation of a urinary bladder mass, typically helps to make the diagnosis. However, morphologic mimics of urothelial carcinoma are not uncommon and they can mimic both invasive and noninvasive forms, range from benign to malignant, and therefore pose significant diagnostic pitfalls that have profound effect on a patient's treatment planning and prognostic implications. Herein, we discuss some of the diagnostic mimickers of urothelial carcinoma and the clinical, immunohistochemical and molecular approaches that can prove useful for making the correct diagnosis. We highlight both the most common and the most difficult diagnostic dilemmas and pitfalls that we have seen in our clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semdp.2026.150993
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histologic mimics of urothelial carcinoma

Dan Wu, Emily Chan
Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Histologic mimics of urothelial carcinoma

Dan Wu, Emily Chan
article en

Abstract

Conventional urothelial carcinoma in its invasive form has a relatively nonspecific morphologic description, frequently described as nests of epithelial cells containing hyperchromatic and pleomorphic nuclei, with readily identified mitotic figures, and moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm, infiltrating as irregular nests, single cells or solid sheets. The presence of a noninvasive papillary or flat component (urothelial carcinoma in situ), combined with the clinical presentation of a urinary bladder mass, typically helps to make the diagnosis. However, morphologic mimics of urothelial carcinoma are not uncommon and they can mimic both invasive and noninvasive forms, range from benign to malignant, and therefore pose significant diagnostic pitfalls that have profound effect on a patient's treatment planning and prognostic implications. Herein, we discuss some of the diagnostic mimickers of urothelial carcinoma and the clinical, immunohistochemical and molecular approaches that can prove useful for making the correct diagnosis. We highlight both the most common and the most difficult diagnostic dilemmas and pitfalls that we have seen in our clinical practice.

Seminars in Diagnostic PathologyVol. 43(2)
Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.