Comparison & Election Between AI Models: Heterodox Analysis of Conditions*

A heterodox review of the development of everyday implementations of artificial intelligencealgorithms, their biases, and risks to human life due to a lack of transparency or the black box effect. This paperfocuses on the evaluation of a problem that has influenced the development of artificial intelligence: the ethicaleconomic dilemma of the black box, along with its paradox. Focusing on this problem—whether transparencyprevails over algorithmic performance (and how it is valued, with its biases and risks)—allows us to understandthe paradox that leads to the current dichotomy between the Anglo-Saxon and continental European worlds.Through a bibliometric-narrative and critical-hermeneutic study, along with the theoretical and methodologicalframeworks of Austrian Economics and New-Institutional Economics (given their experience in analyzing otherblack boxes, such as the State, the public sector, and welfare economics), this paper offers an exposition andexplanation of the problem, its scope, and whether a future convergence of positions on the matter can beexpected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18409741
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison & Election Between AI Models: Heterodox Analysis of Conditions*

Yanovskiy Moshe, Socol Yehoshua, Bayón Antonio Sánchez-, Segovia Francisco Javier Sastre
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Comparison & Election Between AI Models: Heterodox Analysis of Conditions*

Yanovskiy Moshe, Socol Yehoshua, Bayón Antonio Sánchez-, Segovia Francisco Javier Sastre
article en

Abstract

A heterodox review of the development of everyday implementations of artificial intelligencealgorithms, their biases, and risks to human life due to a lack of transparency or the black box effect. This paperfocuses on the evaluation of a problem that has influenced the development of artificial intelligence: the ethicaleconomic dilemma of the black box, along with its paradox. Focusing on this problem—whether transparencyprevails over algorithmic performance (and how it is valued, with its biases and risks)—allows us to understandthe paradox that leads to the current dichotomy between the Anglo-Saxon and continental European worlds.Through a bibliometric-narrative and critical-hermeneutic study, along with the theoretical and methodologicalframeworks of Austrian Economics and New-Institutional Economics (given their experience in analyzing otherblack boxes, such as the State, the public sector, and welfare economics), this paper offers an exposition andexplanation of the problem, its scope, and whether a future convergence of positions on the matter can beexpected.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Jerusalem College of Technology (IL), EAE Business School (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.