Abstract TP129: Comparative Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Stroke-Causing and Asymptomatic Carotid Webs

Background: A carotid web is a shelf-like projection of intimal tissue in the carotid bulb that can cause stroke, particularly in younger patients. The risk of recurrent events after web-associated stroke/TIA and the optimal prevention strategy remain uncertain with limited longitudinal data available. Methods: We conducted a two-center retrospective cohort study of patients with confirmed carotid webs on neck CT angiography between 2021–2024. Webs were considered symptomatic if the index ischemic event was only in the ipsilateral carotid distribution and no other etiology was present, and asymptomatic if the web was incidentally identified, there were infarcts in other distributions, or there were other stroke etiologies present. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA. Event rates were calculated per 100 person-years. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for vascular risk factors estimated the hazard of recurrence. Results: Among 214 patients with confirmed webs (24 symptomatic, 190 asymptomatic), baseline demographics and vascular risk profiles were similar between groups. Over a median follow-up of 14.4 months (IQR 3.7–26.1), ischemic events occurred in 3/24 patients with symptomatic web (12.5%) and 12/190 patients with asymptomatic web (6.3%). The corresponding event rates were 6.8 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.2–21.1) for symptomatic webs and 4.5 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.6–7.9) for asymptomatic webs. Adjusted analysis demonstrated a non-significant twofold higher risk of recurrence with symptomatic webs (HR 2.04, 95% CI 0.56–7.34) compared to asymptomatic webs. Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or stenting (n=5) had no recurrent events during 10.0 person-years of follow-up, compared with 9.4% recurrence in medically managed patients with symptomatic webs (event rate 6 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 1.9–18.7). Conclusions: In this two-center cohort, patients with symptomatic carotid webs had a numerically higher risk of recurrent ischemic events compared with those with asymptomatic webs, though statistical significance was not reached. The absence of recurrences after carotid intervention highlights the need for prospective studies to refine risk stratification and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp129
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP129: Comparative Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Stroke-Causing and Asymptomatic Carotid Webs

Brooks P. Applewhite, Sriharsha Voleti, Konstanze Guggenberger, Shenghua Zhu et al.
Stroke
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
article

Abstract TP129: Comparative Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Stroke-Causing and Asymptomatic Carotid Webs

Brooks P. Applewhite, Sriharsha Voleti, Konstanze Guggenberger, Shenghua Zhu, Banafsheh Shakibajahromi, Pargol Balali, Yu Sakai, Baris Alten, Steven R Messe, Aaron Rothstein, Jae Song
article en

Abstract

Background: A carotid web is a shelf-like projection of intimal tissue in the carotid bulb that can cause stroke, particularly in younger patients. The risk of recurrent events after web-associated stroke/TIA and the optimal prevention strategy remain uncertain with limited longitudinal data available. Methods: We conducted a two-center retrospective cohort study of patients with confirmed carotid webs on neck CT angiography between 2021–2024. Webs were considered symptomatic if the index ischemic event was only in the ipsilateral carotid distribution and no other etiology was present, and asymptomatic if the web was incidentally identified, there were infarcts in other distributions, or there were other stroke etiologies present. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA. Event rates were calculated per 100 person-years. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for vascular risk factors estimated the hazard of recurrence. Results: Among 214 patients with confirmed webs (24 symptomatic, 190 asymptomatic), baseline demographics and vascular risk profiles were similar between groups. Over a median follow-up of 14.4 months (IQR 3.7–26.1), ischemic events occurred in 3/24 patients with symptomatic web (12.5%) and 12/190 patients with asymptomatic web (6.3%). The corresponding event rates were 6.8 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.2–21.1) for symptomatic webs and 4.5 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.6–7.9) for asymptomatic webs. Adjusted analysis demonstrated a non-significant twofold higher risk of recurrence with symptomatic webs (HR 2.04, 95% CI 0.56–7.34) compared to asymptomatic webs. Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or stenting (n=5) had no recurrent events during 10.0 person-years of follow-up, compared with 9.4% recurrence in medically managed patients with symptomatic webs (event rate 6 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 1.9–18.7). Conclusions: In this two-center cohort, patients with symptomatic carotid webs had a numerically higher risk of recurrent ischemic events compared with those with asymptomatic webs, though statistical significance was not reached. The absence of recurrences after carotid intervention highlights the need for prospective studies to refine risk stratification and management.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.