When Stability Fails: Rare Very Late Dislodgement of 3830 Lead

We report a rare case of very late dislodgement of a Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 lumenless lead three years after successful left bundle branch area pacing. An 88-year-old patient with permanent atrial fibrillation and bifascicular block underwent VVIR pacemaker implantation in 2022 with excellent initial parameters (threshold 0.8 V at 0.5 ms, impedance 650 Ω) and stable follow-up for three years. The patient presented with pre-syncopal episodes, and device interrogation revealed capture failure with elevated threshold (2.25 V/0.4 ms) and decreased impedance. Fluoroscopic comparison confirmed macro-dislodgement of the lead with coiling in the pacemaker pocket. The SelectSecure lead was successfully extracted and replaced with a conventional stylet-driven lead positioned in the right ventricular mid-septum. This case highlights that late lead dislodgement can occur with lumenless leads even years after successful implantation, emphasizing the need for continued vigilance during long-term follow-up of cardiac physiological pacing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Case Reports
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.71819
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Stability Fails: Rare Very Late Dislodgement of 3830 Lead

Arnab De, Rabin Chakraborty, Dilip Kumar, Ashesh Halder et al.
Clinical Case Reports
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

When Stability Fails: Rare Very Late Dislodgement of 3830 Lead

Arnab De, Rabin Chakraborty, Dilip Kumar, Ashesh Halder, Niladri Ghosh, Srashti Kulshrestha
article en

Abstract

We report a rare case of very late dislodgement of a Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 lumenless lead three years after successful left bundle branch area pacing. An 88-year-old patient with permanent atrial fibrillation and bifascicular block underwent VVIR pacemaker implantation in 2022 with excellent initial parameters (threshold 0.8 V at 0.5 ms, impedance 650 Ω) and stable follow-up for three years. The patient presented with pre-syncopal episodes, and device interrogation revealed capture failure with elevated threshold (2.25 V/0.4 ms) and decreased impedance. Fluoroscopic comparison confirmed macro-dislodgement of the lead with coiling in the pacemaker pocket. The SelectSecure lead was successfully extracted and replaced with a conventional stylet-driven lead positioned in the right ventricular mid-septum. This case highlights that late lead dislodgement can occur with lumenless leads even years after successful implantation, emphasizing the need for continued vigilance during long-term follow-up of cardiac physiological pacing systems.

Clinical Case ReportsVol. 14(2)
Manipal Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.