Peripheral intravenous waveform analysis for evaluating volume status in healthy volunteers and mechanically ventilated patients

Timely diagnosis of blood loss and evaluation of intravascular volume status are pivotal tasks in clinical practice. Recent studies in animals and during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in humans indicate that peripheral intravenous pressure waveform analysis (PIVA) may detect early stages of blood loss. As PIVA only requires a peripheral venous cannula, it may have value in emergency settings. However, its clinical relevance remains uncertain. This study examined how volume changes affect the PIVA-derived fundamental frequency (PIVAF1). Two cohorts were studied. The LBNP cohort comprised 15 healthy volunteers exposed to simulated blood loss in 10 mmHg increments of LBNP every two minutes from 0 to 80 mmHg, or until hemodynamic decompensation. The general anesthesia (GA)-cohort included 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery who underwent preload increase with a head-down tilt. Peripheral intravenous pressure waveforms were continuously recorded from an antecubital vein and analyzed using short-time Fourier transform to extract the amplitude at the heart-rate frequency (PIVAF1). Changes in PIVAF1 were analyzed using linear regression. In the LBNP-cohort, data were log(e) – transformed and associated with a change per LBNP level of -0.11 (95% CI -0.14 to -0.09, P < 0.001). In the GA-cohort, PIVAF1 did not reliably predict a 10% change in stroke volume with head-down tilt [AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; P = 0.11)]. We found statistically significant reductions in PIVAF1 during simulated blood loss but PIVAF1 did not predict increasing stroke volume during head-down tilt in general anesthesia. The clinical significance of PIVA remains to be elucidated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01408-6
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peripheral intravenous waveform analysis for evaluating volume status in healthy volunteers and mechanically ventilated patients

Svein Aslak Landsverk, Lars Øivind Høiseth, Harald Lenz, J. Hisdal et al.
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Peripheral intravenous waveform analysis for evaluating volume status in healthy volunteers and mechanically ventilated patients

Svein Aslak Landsverk, Lars Øivind Høiseth, Harald Lenz, J. Hisdal, Sole Lindvåg Lie, Aura Koistinaho, Prof. Marius Rehn
article en

Abstract

Timely diagnosis of blood loss and evaluation of intravascular volume status are pivotal tasks in clinical practice. Recent studies in animals and during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in humans indicate that peripheral intravenous pressure waveform analysis (PIVA) may detect early stages of blood loss. As PIVA only requires a peripheral venous cannula, it may have value in emergency settings. However, its clinical relevance remains uncertain. This study examined how volume changes affect the PIVA-derived fundamental frequency (PIVAF1). Two cohorts were studied. The LBNP cohort comprised 15 healthy volunteers exposed to simulated blood loss in 10 mmHg increments of LBNP every two minutes from 0 to 80 mmHg, or until hemodynamic decompensation. The general anesthesia (GA)-cohort included 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery who underwent preload increase with a head-down tilt. Peripheral intravenous pressure waveforms were continuously recorded from an antecubital vein and analyzed using short-time Fourier transform to extract the amplitude at the heart-rate frequency (PIVAF1). Changes in PIVAF1 were analyzed using linear regression. In the LBNP-cohort, data were log(e) – transformed and associated with a change per LBNP level of -0.11 (95% CI -0.14 to -0.09, P < 0.001). In the GA-cohort, PIVAF1 did not reliably predict a 10% change in stroke volume with head-down tilt [AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; P = 0.11)]. We found statistically significant reductions in PIVAF1 during simulated blood loss but PIVAF1 did not predict increasing stroke volume during head-down tilt in general anesthesia. The clinical significance of PIVA remains to be elucidated.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse (NO), Akershus University Hospital (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.