Professional Ethics of Industrial and Organisational Psychologists in Aotearoa New Zealand

The New Zealand Psychological Society’s Code of Ethics guides the ethical practice of all registered psychologists working in New Zealand. Yet, emerging research suggests that the availability of a general code of ethics may fail to adequately support psychologists practicing in non-clinical domains, including Industrial/Organisational (IO) psychologists. Our study relied on 12 structured interviews with registered IO-trained psychologists in New Zealand to explore the main ethical issues and dilemmas encountered in the profession, and their views about the Code’s ability to guide their practice. Findings from our thematic analysis show that IO-trained psychologists believe the Code offers limited and at times ambiguous direction for ethical decision-making and may contribute to sustaining blurred boundaries across scopes of practice. We discuss the contribution of our findings to a wider debate about the unification of the psychology profession and differentiation across domains of practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand journal of psychology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63146/001c.156009
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professional Ethics of Industrial and Organisational Psychologists in Aotearoa New Zealand

Carolyn Mason, Shane Pond, Joana Kuntz
New Zealand journal of psychology
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Professional Ethics of Industrial and Organisational Psychologists in Aotearoa New Zealand

Carolyn Mason, Shane Pond, Joana Kuntz
article en

Abstract

The New Zealand Psychological Society’s Code of Ethics guides the ethical practice of all registered psychologists working in New Zealand. Yet, emerging research suggests that the availability of a general code of ethics may fail to adequately support psychologists practicing in non-clinical domains, including Industrial/Organisational (IO) psychologists. Our study relied on 12 structured interviews with registered IO-trained psychologists in New Zealand to explore the main ethical issues and dilemmas encountered in the profession, and their views about the Code’s ability to guide their practice. Findings from our thematic analysis show that IO-trained psychologists believe the Code offers limited and at times ambiguous direction for ethical decision-making and may contribute to sustaining blurred boundaries across scopes of practice. We discuss the contribution of our findings to a wider debate about the unification of the psychology profession and differentiation across domains of practice.

New Zealand journal of psychologyVol. 55(1)
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.