Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods: Risk Perspectives Across Different Regulatory Systems

<i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> poses a significant challenge in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods due to its persistence in processing environments and severe impact on vulnerable populations. Regulatory approaches differ internationally, reflecting distinct conceptual frameworks and tolerance thresholds. These differences arise from the adoption of zero-tolerance or risk-based regulatory models, which define qualitative or quantitative microbiological limits (absence in 25 g or up to 100 cfu/g) based on a product's growth potential, and vary in the extent of environmental monitoring, sampling plans, and verification intensity across jurisdictions. In 2024, the European Union updated its regulatory framework governing the microbiological criteria for <i>L. monocytogenes</i>. Previous requirements were strengthened, responsibility was extended across the supply chain, and a strategic role was assigned to challenge testing carried out by manufacturers. This review examines how the European Union and the United States apply risk assessment principles, challenge testing, predictive modelling, and environmental monitoring to control <i>L. monocytogenes</i> in RTE foods. By integrating epidemiological trends, regulatory criteria, and experimental evidence, key differences in safety objectives, validation procedures, and risk management strategies are highlighted. This review also identifies gaps and opportunities for harmonisation, providing guidance for improved evidence-based decision-making and regulatory compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15030470
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods: Risk Perspectives Across Different Regulatory Systems

Antonello Paparella, Maria Schirone, Giovanni D’Ambrosio
1 citations
Foods
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
27.96
article

Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods: Risk Perspectives Across Different Regulatory Systems

Antonello Paparella, Maria Schirone, Giovanni D’Ambrosio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> poses a significant challenge in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods due to its persistence in processing environments and severe impact on vulnerable populations. Regulatory approaches differ internationally, reflecting distinct conceptual frameworks and tolerance thresholds. These differences arise from the adoption of zero-tolerance or risk-based regulatory models, which define qualitative or quantitative microbiological limits (absence in 25 g or up to 100 cfu/g) based on a product's growth potential, and vary in the extent of environmental monitoring, sampling plans, and verification intensity across jurisdictions. In 2024, the European Union updated its regulatory framework governing the microbiological criteria for <i>L. monocytogenes</i>. Previous requirements were strengthened, responsibility was extended across the supply chain, and a strategic role was assigned to challenge testing carried out by manufacturers. This review examines how the European Union and the United States apply risk assessment principles, challenge testing, predictive modelling, and environmental monitoring to control <i>L. monocytogenes</i> in RTE foods. By integrating epidemiological trends, regulatory criteria, and experimental evidence, key differences in safety objectives, validation procedures, and risk management strategies are highlighted. This review also identifies gaps and opportunities for harmonisation, providing guidance for improved evidence-based decision-making and regulatory compliance.

FoodsVol. 15(3)
University of Teramo (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
27.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.