Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for motor function preservation during AVMs resection: Indication or redundancy? Beyond the doctrine of “all-or-nothing”

The resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) involving eloquent motor regions remains one of the most challenging tasks in neurosurgery due to the risk of irreversible motor deficits. Historically, such lesions have often been managed conservatively or with radiosurgery, particularly when located near primary motor cortex or corticospinal tracts. However, the advent of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows for real-time feedback on motor pathway function, potentially enabling safer resections in areas previously considered inoperable. This study investigates the effectiveness of IONM in reducing motor morbidity during AVM surgery. We prospectively enrolled 48 patients who underwent AVM resection between 2018 and 2025 at a single center. All surgeries incorporated a standardized IONM protocol, including continuous somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and dynamic cortical and subcortical mapping. Patients were stratified into high and low motor-risk groups based on AVM topography. Clinical, imaging, and angioarchitectural data were analyzed. Primary outcomes were new postoperative motor deficits; secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and residual nidus presence. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate regression. Of the 48 patients (mean age 45.2), 42% presented with hemorrhage and 50% had left-hemisphere AVMs. Spetzler-Martin grades ranged from I to IV. Three patients (6.25%) had residual AVM postoperatively, two of which were intentional due to IONM alerts. None developed new deficits. One residual spontaneously thrombosed during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed preoperative mRS, not motor eloquence, was the main predictor of outcome in ruptured AVMs. No significant difference in postoperative motor function or mRS was found between high- and low-risk groups. IONM enables safe, function-preserving AVM resection in motor eloquent areas. It supports intraoperative decision-making, reducing morbidity and expanding surgical indications guiding a “maximal safe resection” strategy focused on functional preservation rather than angiographic radicality alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical Review
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-026-04146-8
Primary Topic
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for motor function preservation during AVMs resection: Indication or redundancy? Beyond the doctrine of “all-or-nothing”

Michele Di Domenico, Gianluca Trevisi, Fulvio Grilli, Rina Di Bonaventura et al.
Neurosurgical Review
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
article

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for motor function preservation during AVMs resection: Indication or redundancy? Beyond the doctrine of “all-or-nothing”

Michele Di Domenico, Gianluca Trevisi, Fulvio Grilli, Rina Di Bonaventura, Marco Galeazzi, Alessandro Olivi, Carmelo Lucio Sturiale, Alessio Albanese, Matteo Palermo
article en

Abstract

The resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) involving eloquent motor regions remains one of the most challenging tasks in neurosurgery due to the risk of irreversible motor deficits. Historically, such lesions have often been managed conservatively or with radiosurgery, particularly when located near primary motor cortex or corticospinal tracts. However, the advent of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows for real-time feedback on motor pathway function, potentially enabling safer resections in areas previously considered inoperable. This study investigates the effectiveness of IONM in reducing motor morbidity during AVM surgery. We prospectively enrolled 48 patients who underwent AVM resection between 2018 and 2025 at a single center. All surgeries incorporated a standardized IONM protocol, including continuous somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and dynamic cortical and subcortical mapping. Patients were stratified into high and low motor-risk groups based on AVM topography. Clinical, imaging, and angioarchitectural data were analyzed. Primary outcomes were new postoperative motor deficits; secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and residual nidus presence. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate regression. Of the 48 patients (mean age 45.2), 42% presented with hemorrhage and 50% had left-hemisphere AVMs. Spetzler-Martin grades ranged from I to IV. Three patients (6.25%) had residual AVM postoperatively, two of which were intentional due to IONM alerts. None developed new deficits. One residual spontaneously thrombosed during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed preoperative mRS, not motor eloquence, was the main predictor of outcome in ruptured AVMs. No significant difference in postoperative motor function or mRS was found between high- and low-risk groups. IONM enables safe, function-preserving AVM resection in motor eloquent areas. It supports intraoperative decision-making, reducing morbidity and expanding surgical indications guiding a “maximal safe resection” strategy focused on functional preservation rather than angiographic radicality alone.

Neurosurgical ReviewVol. 49(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Ospedale di Santo Spirito (IT)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.