Incinerating Old Waste from Landfills? An Assessment of Dynamic Climate Change Impacts

Chinese waste incinerators have substantial excess capacity, and it has been suggested that waste from landfills be excavated to increase the energy recovery by using vacant incineration capacity. By means of life cycle assessment (LCA), we assess this suggestion in terms of its climate change impacts. Given the temporal properties of the issue, we used a dynamic LCA approach by specifying emissions and energy recovery for each year over a 100-year period. We then quantified climate change in terms of radiative forcing (W/m<sup>2</sup>) for each year, in contrast to a traditional LCA approach summarizing emissions and energy recovery over a 100-year period in terms of kg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalents. We considered several waste compositions and a range of ages of landfilled waste. The results of dynamic LCA revealed that for a time horizon of 10-50 years, excavation and incineration of landfilled waste is beneficial only for reducing the cumulative radiative forcing if the waste is only 2-3 years old. Waste older than 4 years old should, in all cases, remain in the landfill from a climate change point of view. The traditional LCA approach revealed its shortcomings compared with the dynamic LCA approach. Considering technologies with time-distributed emissions and energy recoveries, we warn against indiscriminate use of the traditional approach when decisions are supposed to contribute to reducing climate change impacts to meet political targets set for the next few decades.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c13340
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incinerating Old Waste from Landfills? An Assessment of Dynamic Climate Change Impacts

Anders Damgaard, Shengwei Wang, Rui Han, T. H. Christensen et al.
Environmental Science & Technology
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Incinerating Old Waste from Landfills? An Assessment of Dynamic Climate Change Impacts

Anders Damgaard, Shengwei Wang, Rui Han, T. H. Christensen, Yan Zhao
article en

Abstract

Chinese waste incinerators have substantial excess capacity, and it has been suggested that waste from landfills be excavated to increase the energy recovery by using vacant incineration capacity. By means of life cycle assessment (LCA), we assess this suggestion in terms of its climate change impacts. Given the temporal properties of the issue, we used a dynamic LCA approach by specifying emissions and energy recovery for each year over a 100-year period. We then quantified climate change in terms of radiative forcing (W/m<sup>2</sup>) for each year, in contrast to a traditional LCA approach summarizing emissions and energy recovery over a 100-year period in terms of kg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalents. We considered several waste compositions and a range of ages of landfilled waste. The results of dynamic LCA revealed that for a time horizon of 10-50 years, excavation and incineration of landfilled waste is beneficial only for reducing the cumulative radiative forcing if the waste is only 2-3 years old. Waste older than 4 years old should, in all cases, remain in the landfill from a climate change point of view. The traditional LCA approach revealed its shortcomings compared with the dynamic LCA approach. Considering technologies with time-distributed emissions and energy recoveries, we warn against indiscriminate use of the traditional approach when decisions are supposed to contribute to reducing climate change impacts to meet political targets set for the next few decades.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 60(5)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.