Abstract TP034: Toward a Unified Strategy for Stroke of Unknown Onset

Introduction: Advanced treatment options now exist that are available for some ischemic strokes who arrive with unknown onset time; commonly called wake-up stroke (W-S). When triaging these patients with W-S, concerns regarding thrombolytic therapy eligibility arise due to unknown onset time. We analyzed current hospital level practices and thrombolytic treatment considerations for W-S stroke in in Texas (TX) and Louisiana (LA) with high prevalence of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Potential hospitals included stroke centers identified affiliated with a research consortium in Texas (TX), or as affiliated with a health system in Louisiana (LA). This data included hospitals characteristics, structural capacity and annual metrics, and current procedures for W-S patients at these institutions. Additionally, via the survey, the hospital’s stroke team was assessed on their knowledge regarding W-S. The survey was developed by a multidisciplinary collaborative of stroke specialists and hosted on a REDCap platform. Data analysis was completed using SAS v9.4. Results: Data were received from 54 (98.2%) of 55 hospitals contacted in LA (29) and TX (25). Survey responses were collected between 9/1/2024 and 3/31/2025. The 39 (72.2%) hospitals that reported using a standardized W-S protocol included all 29 health system hospitals in LA, and 10 hospitals in TX. 48 (96.0%) stated less than ¼ of patients received thrombolytics for W-S. Hospitals with a wake-up stroke (W-S) protocol were significantly associated with fewer stroke beds (P = .0092), fewer called stroke codes (P = .0040), physician-dependent transfer decisions (P = .0002), higher thrombolytic eligibility (P <.0001). Conversely, hospitals with more stroke admissions were less likely to have a W-S protocol (P = .0072), indicating that higher patient volume may influence protocol utilization. Conclusion: There is significant variability in which stroke centers follow a W-S protocol. While large Comprehensive Stroke Centers are more equipped with advanced imaging and specialized expertise necessary to evaluate patients with unknown time of onset, they demonstrated a lower frequency of endorsing a W-S protocol than smaller hospitals. Requiring CSCs to identify their W-S process of care may improve access and delivery of acute stroke therapy to patients who present with unknown onset times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp034
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP034: Toward a Unified Strategy for Stroke of Unknown Onset

Kim Barker, Mehari Gebreyohanns, Smriti Prasad, Eugene S. Jones et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract TP034: Toward a Unified Strategy for Stroke of Unknown Onset

Kim Barker, Mehari Gebreyohanns, Smriti Prasad, Eugene S. Jones, Daiwai Olson, Lindsay M. Riskey, Nneka Ifejika, Joshua Amos
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced treatment options now exist that are available for some ischemic strokes who arrive with unknown onset time; commonly called wake-up stroke (W-S). When triaging these patients with W-S, concerns regarding thrombolytic therapy eligibility arise due to unknown onset time. We analyzed current hospital level practices and thrombolytic treatment considerations for W-S stroke in in Texas (TX) and Louisiana (LA) with high prevalence of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Potential hospitals included stroke centers identified affiliated with a research consortium in Texas (TX), or as affiliated with a health system in Louisiana (LA). This data included hospitals characteristics, structural capacity and annual metrics, and current procedures for W-S patients at these institutions. Additionally, via the survey, the hospital’s stroke team was assessed on their knowledge regarding W-S. The survey was developed by a multidisciplinary collaborative of stroke specialists and hosted on a REDCap platform. Data analysis was completed using SAS v9.4. Results: Data were received from 54 (98.2%) of 55 hospitals contacted in LA (29) and TX (25). Survey responses were collected between 9/1/2024 and 3/31/2025. The 39 (72.2%) hospitals that reported using a standardized W-S protocol included all 29 health system hospitals in LA, and 10 hospitals in TX. 48 (96.0%) stated less than ¼ of patients received thrombolytics for W-S. Hospitals with a wake-up stroke (W-S) protocol were significantly associated with fewer stroke beds (P = .0092), fewer called stroke codes (P = .0040), physician-dependent transfer decisions (P = .0002), higher thrombolytic eligibility (P <.0001). Conversely, hospitals with more stroke admissions were less likely to have a W-S protocol (P = .0072), indicating that higher patient volume may influence protocol utilization. Conclusion: There is significant variability in which stroke centers follow a W-S protocol. While large Comprehensive Stroke Centers are more equipped with advanced imaging and specialized expertise necessary to evaluate patients with unknown time of onset, they demonstrated a lower frequency of endorsing a W-S protocol than smaller hospitals. Requiring CSCs to identify their W-S process of care may improve access and delivery of acute stroke therapy to patients who present with unknown onset times.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Ochsner Health System (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.