<i>Fichu(s)</i> : Animals between Adorno and Derrida

In his 2001 Theodor W. Adorno Prize speech, ‘Fichus’, Jacques Derrida imagines a book on the German philosopher that he would never have the opportunity to write. Its last chapter would concern animals, which for Derrida constitute the most important future direction in reading Adorno. This article takes this moment as its point of departure to suggest that among the many threads that connect deconstruction with critical theory, the question of the animal takes on central significance. Reconsidering ‘Fichus’ as a reflection on the responsibilities of thinking about and after the end, I argue that for both philosophers, animals point to an alternative form of thought, one that is not only concerned but imbued with finitude. Non-coercive and anti-totalitarian, it is a thinking without ends, a form of contemplation that arises from and in response to other animals but is not limited to them. Reading Adorno and Derrida through, with, and after each other, I interpret ‘Fichus’ as an exercise in such poetic thinking, exploring its implications in and beyond Derrida’s speech.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Derrida Today
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2026.0394
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fichu(s) : Animals between Adorno and Derrida

Natalie Lozinski-Veach
Derrida Today
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Fichu(s) : Animals between Adorno and Derrida

Natalie Lozinski-Veach
article en

Abstract

In his 2001 Theodor W. Adorno Prize speech, ‘Fichus’, Jacques Derrida imagines a book on the German philosopher that he would never have the opportunity to write. Its last chapter would concern animals, which for Derrida constitute the most important future direction in reading Adorno. This article takes this moment as its point of departure to suggest that among the many threads that connect deconstruction with critical theory, the question of the animal takes on central significance. Reconsidering ‘Fichus’ as a reflection on the responsibilities of thinking about and after the end, I argue that for both philosophers, animals point to an alternative form of thought, one that is not only concerned but imbued with finitude. Non-coercive and anti-totalitarian, it is a thinking without ends, a form of contemplation that arises from and in response to other animals but is not limited to them. Reading Adorno and Derrida through, with, and after each other, I interpret ‘Fichus’ as an exercise in such poetic thinking, exploring its implications in and beyond Derrida’s speech.

Derrida TodayVol. 19(1)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<i>Fichu(s)</i> : Animals between Adorno and Derrida — Natalie Lozinski-Veach · Derrida Today (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS