Abstract WP030: Association of prehospital treatment duration with the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in the RESIST trial

Background: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) initiated in the prehospital setting did not improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with acute stroke in the RESIST trial. Trials of other neuroprotective therapies have identified the duration of treatment received prior to reperfusion (“dwell time”) as a treatment effect modifier. We examined whether the effects of RIC might be modified by the duration of prehospital treatment that patients received. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the RESIST randomized-controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03481777), we compared outcomes in patients with prehospital stroke symptoms for less than 4 hours, assigned to RIC versus sham, and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) – the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population – stratified by time from randomization to hospital admission (i.e. prehospital treatment duration). The primary outcome was improvement in the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS 0-2 and neurological improvement according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24-hours. Results: Among 902 patients in the mITT population with AIS (n=737) and ICH (n=165), the median randomization-to-admission time was 29.4 minutes (IQR 19.6-39.4 minutes). Upon examining the effect of RIC treatment by pre-hospital treatment duration, there were no significant treatment effects in either the combined mITT, ICH, or AIS groups in any of the transport time groups. Further stratifying patients with AIS based on receipt of reperfusion therapies also revealed no significant differences in RIC efficacy across time. There was no interaction between RIC and pre-hospital treatment duration in relation to 90-day mRS or early NIHSS improvement in the AIS or ICH populations. Conclusion: Longer prehospital treatment duration was not associated with efficacy of RIC in patients with AIS or ICH in the RESIST trial including among AIS patients who received reperfusion therapies, although durations were generally under an hour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp030
Primary Topic
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP030: Association of prehospital treatment duration with the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in the RESIST trial

Martin Faurholdt Gude, Boris Modrau, Aravind Ganesh, Claus Simonsen et al.
Stroke
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
article

Abstract WP030: Association of prehospital treatment duration with the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in the RESIST trial

Martin Faurholdt Gude, Boris Modrau, Aravind Ganesh, Claus Simonsen, Rolf Blauenfeldt, David Gaist, Anne Brink Behrndtz
article en

Abstract

Background: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) initiated in the prehospital setting did not improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with acute stroke in the RESIST trial. Trials of other neuroprotective therapies have identified the duration of treatment received prior to reperfusion (“dwell time”) as a treatment effect modifier. We examined whether the effects of RIC might be modified by the duration of prehospital treatment that patients received. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the RESIST randomized-controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03481777), we compared outcomes in patients with prehospital stroke symptoms for less than 4 hours, assigned to RIC versus sham, and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) – the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population – stratified by time from randomization to hospital admission (i.e. prehospital treatment duration). The primary outcome was improvement in the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS 0-2 and neurological improvement according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24-hours. Results: Among 902 patients in the mITT population with AIS (n=737) and ICH (n=165), the median randomization-to-admission time was 29.4 minutes (IQR 19.6-39.4 minutes). Upon examining the effect of RIC treatment by pre-hospital treatment duration, there were no significant treatment effects in either the combined mITT, ICH, or AIS groups in any of the transport time groups. Further stratifying patients with AIS based on receipt of reperfusion therapies also revealed no significant differences in RIC efficacy across time. There was no interaction between RIC and pre-hospital treatment duration in relation to 90-day mRS or early NIHSS improvement in the AIS or ICH populations. Conclusion: Longer prehospital treatment duration was not associated with efficacy of RIC in patients with AIS or ICH in the RESIST trial including among AIS patients who received reperfusion therapies, although durations were generally under an hour.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
University of Calgary (CA), Aarhus University (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), North Denmark Region (DK), Central Denmark Region (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.