From Informational Coherence to Regime Transitions: A Structural Continuity Note

This technical note documents the structural continuity between earlier work developed under the Informational Coherence Model (MCI) and the axiomatic framework of Regime Shift Theory (RST). No new physical assumptions, mechanisms, laws, or ontological claims are introduced. The note does not extend, revise, or reinterpret prior results. Its sole purpose is to clarify the evolution of scope and methodological level across the two frameworks, making explicit their non-competitive and non-overlapping roles. MCI operates at a descriptive and phenomenological level, addressing coherence patterns within specific regimes. RST, by contrast, operates at a second-level methodological layer, formalizing the structural conditions under which models and descriptions lose validity due to regime transitions, irreversibility, loss of comparability, or non-transitivity. This document serves exclusively as a continuity reference and historical linkage. It should not be read as a complete theoretical formulation, a unifying framework, or a proposal of new physics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18417755
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Informational Coherence to Regime Transitions: A Structural Continuity Note

Danilo Tavella
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Critical Realism in Sociology
article

From Informational Coherence to Regime Transitions: A Structural Continuity Note

Danilo Tavella
article en

Abstract

This technical note documents the structural continuity between earlier work developed under the Informational Coherence Model (MCI) and the axiomatic framework of Regime Shift Theory (RST). No new physical assumptions, mechanisms, laws, or ontological claims are introduced. The note does not extend, revise, or reinterpret prior results. Its sole purpose is to clarify the evolution of scope and methodological level across the two frameworks, making explicit their non-competitive and non-overlapping roles. MCI operates at a descriptive and phenomenological level, addressing coherence patterns within specific regimes. RST, by contrast, operates at a second-level methodological layer, formalizing the structural conditions under which models and descriptions lose validity due to regime transitions, irreversibility, loss of comparability, or non-transitivity. This document serves exclusively as a continuity reference and historical linkage. It should not be read as a complete theoretical formulation, a unifying framework, or a proposal of new physics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.