Comparison of patient- and parent-reported outcome measures in pediatric limb deformity patients as assessed by the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire

The agreement - or lack thereof - between patient- and parent-reported limb deformity Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) questionnaires has not been described. Proxy accuracy varies depending on the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) used and patient population, with differences reported in zero, some, or all content subgroups. This prospective study compares patient- and parent-reported scores to understand where the LD-SRS falls on this continuum. We enrolled 24 subjects aged 11-18 years who had lower limb deformity surgery (11 internal nail lengthening, 6 osteotomy, 5 guided growth, and 4 external fixation procedures). Children and their guardians completed the appropriate patient- or parent-reported LD-SRS before surgery, which were compared using established content subgroups. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was found in the mental health content subgroup (effect size = 0.5). No significant differences were observed in the function/activity, pain, or self-image/appearance content subgroups, and global scores did not vary significantly. Although proxy LD-SRS reports are largely informative, the significant difference between patient- and parent-reported scores in the mental health content subgroup emphasizes the value of obtaining PROMs from the adolescent whenever possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bpb.0000000000001328
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of patient- and parent-reported outcome measures in pediatric limb deformity patients as assessed by the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire

R. W. Liu, Tyler J. Moon, Numera Sachwani, Jill C. Flanagan et al.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Comparison of patient- and parent-reported outcome measures in pediatric limb deformity patients as assessed by the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire

R. W. Liu, Tyler J. Moon, Numera Sachwani, Jill C. Flanagan, Emily Canitia, Marlee R. Yancey
article en

Abstract

The agreement - or lack thereof - between patient- and parent-reported limb deformity Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) questionnaires has not been described. Proxy accuracy varies depending on the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) used and patient population, with differences reported in zero, some, or all content subgroups. This prospective study compares patient- and parent-reported scores to understand where the LD-SRS falls on this continuum. We enrolled 24 subjects aged 11-18 years who had lower limb deformity surgery (11 internal nail lengthening, 6 osteotomy, 5 guided growth, and 4 external fixation procedures). Children and their guardians completed the appropriate patient- or parent-reported LD-SRS before surgery, which were compared using established content subgroups. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was found in the mental health content subgroup (effect size = 0.5). No significant differences were observed in the function/activity, pain, or self-image/appearance content subgroups, and global scores did not vary significantly. Although proxy LD-SRS reports are largely informative, the significant difference between patient- and parent-reported scores in the mental health content subgroup emphasizes the value of obtaining PROMs from the adolescent whenever possible.

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US), Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.