From Nanomaterials to Nanofertilizers: Applications, Ecological Risks, and Prospects for Sustainable Agriculture

Nanofertilizers have attracted increasing attention as an approach to improve the low nutrient use efficiency of conventional fertilizers, in which only a limited fraction of applied nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium is ultimately taken up by crops. Beyond their capacity to minimize nutrient losses, nanofertilizers have attracted increasing attention for their possible role in addressing environmental issues, including soil eutrophication and the contamination of groundwater systems. Owing to their nanoscale characteristics, including large specific surface area and enhanced adsorption capacity, these materials enable more precise nutrient delivery to the rhizosphere and sustained release over extended periods, while also influencing soil-plant-microbe interactions. In this review, nanofertilizers are classified into six major categories-macronutrient-based, micronutrient-based, organic, controlled-release, composite, and nano-enhanced formulations-and representative examples and preparation routes are summarized, including green synthesis approaches and conventional chemical methods. The agronomic mechanisms associated with nanofertilizer application are discussed, with emphasis on enhanced nutrient uptake, modification of soil physicochemical properties, and shifts in microbial community composition. Reported studies indicate that nanofertilizers can increase crop yield across different crop species and formulations, while also contributing to improved nutrient cycling. Despite these advantages, several limitations continue to restrict their broader adoption. These include uncertainties regarding long-term environmental behavior, relatively high production costs compared with conventional fertilizers, and the absence of well-defined regulatory and safety assessment frameworks in many regions. Overall, this review highlights both the opportunities and challenges associated with nanofertilizer application and points to the need for further development of cost-effective formulations and standardized evaluation systems that account for their distinct environmental interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030415
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Nanomaterials to Nanofertilizers: Applications, Ecological Risks, and Prospects for Sustainable Agriculture

Yukui Rui, Taiming Zhang
1 citations
Plants
Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
21.28
article

From Nanomaterials to Nanofertilizers: Applications, Ecological Risks, and Prospects for Sustainable Agriculture

Yukui Rui, Taiming Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nanofertilizers have attracted increasing attention as an approach to improve the low nutrient use efficiency of conventional fertilizers, in which only a limited fraction of applied nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium is ultimately taken up by crops. Beyond their capacity to minimize nutrient losses, nanofertilizers have attracted increasing attention for their possible role in addressing environmental issues, including soil eutrophication and the contamination of groundwater systems. Owing to their nanoscale characteristics, including large specific surface area and enhanced adsorption capacity, these materials enable more precise nutrient delivery to the rhizosphere and sustained release over extended periods, while also influencing soil-plant-microbe interactions. In this review, nanofertilizers are classified into six major categories-macronutrient-based, micronutrient-based, organic, controlled-release, composite, and nano-enhanced formulations-and representative examples and preparation routes are summarized, including green synthesis approaches and conventional chemical methods. The agronomic mechanisms associated with nanofertilizer application are discussed, with emphasis on enhanced nutrient uptake, modification of soil physicochemical properties, and shifts in microbial community composition. Reported studies indicate that nanofertilizers can increase crop yield across different crop species and formulations, while also contributing to improved nutrient cycling. Despite these advantages, several limitations continue to restrict their broader adoption. These include uncertainties regarding long-term environmental behavior, relatively high production costs compared with conventional fertilizers, and the absence of well-defined regulatory and safety assessment frameworks in many regions. Overall, this review highlights both the opportunities and challenges associated with nanofertilizer application and points to the need for further development of cost-effective formulations and standardized evaluation systems that account for their distinct environmental interactions.

PlantsVol. 15(3)
Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau (CN), Shangri-la Institute (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
21.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.