Screening for psychotrauma related symptomatology: Greek adaptation and validation of the Global Psychotrauma Screen

<b>Background:</b> Traumatizing experiences significantly impact mental health outcomes, underscoring the need for a concise yet comprehensive assessment tool. The <i>Global Psychotrauma Screen</i> (GPS) was developed to address this gap. Although the GPS has been translated into over 30 languages, including Greek, its cross-cultural validity remains unexamined.<b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Greek GPS.<b>Method:</b> Study 1 involved 1418 participants who completed an online questionnaire<b>,</b> which assessed trauma-related symptoms using the GPS, <i>the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5</i>, the <i>International Trauma Questionnaire</i>, the <i>Symptom Checklist-90-R</i>, the <i>Brief-Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory</i>, the <i>Brief Resilience Scale</i> and the <i>Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support</i>. The dataset from Study 1 was utilized for exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 included a dataset of 971 participants drawn from the Greek adaptation of the CARTS protocol, which was used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis.<b>Results:</b> The results showed satisfactory internal consistency as well as test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the GPS. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a univariate structure of the GPS-Symptoms, with all symptom items exhibiting moderate to high loadings on the underlying factor and the solution accounting for 63.6% and 48.1% of the total variance in study 1 and study 2, respectively, and the univariate model fit indices being <i>X<sup>2</sup></i>(112) <i>=</i> 282.349, <i>p</i> <i><</i> .001, CFI = . 947, SRMR = .039, RMSEA = .040 [90% CI: 0.34-0.045], ECVI = .376 [90% CI: 0.33-.43]. All risk factors were significantly related to each of the GPS-Symptoms. Regression analyses revealed that gender and risk factors significantly predicted GPS-Symptoms.<b>Conclusion:</b> The current study provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of the Greek GPS as a valid and reliable tool for assessing transdiagnostic symptoms following trauma exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2607315
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening for psychotrauma related symptomatology: Greek adaptation and validation of the Global Psychotrauma Screen

Chris Hoeber, Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous, Paul Frewen, Eleni Papathanasiou et al.
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Screening for psychotrauma related symptomatology: Greek adaptation and validation of the Global Psychotrauma Screen

Chris Hoeber, Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous, Paul Frewen, Eleni Papathanasiou, Maria Jernslett, Eleftheria Evgeniou, Ioannis Syros, Christina Miliaraki, Pavlina Charalampidou, Miranda Olff
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Traumatizing experiences significantly impact mental health outcomes, underscoring the need for a concise yet comprehensive assessment tool. The <i>Global Psychotrauma Screen</i> (GPS) was developed to address this gap. Although the GPS has been translated into over 30 languages, including Greek, its cross-cultural validity remains unexamined.<b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Greek GPS.<b>Method:</b> Study 1 involved 1418 participants who completed an online questionnaire<b>,</b> which assessed trauma-related symptoms using the GPS, <i>the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5</i>, the <i>International Trauma Questionnaire</i>, the <i>Symptom Checklist-90-R</i>, the <i>Brief-Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory</i>, the <i>Brief Resilience Scale</i> and the <i>Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support</i>. The dataset from Study 1 was utilized for exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 included a dataset of 971 participants drawn from the Greek adaptation of the CARTS protocol, which was used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis.<b>Results:</b> The results showed satisfactory internal consistency as well as test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the GPS. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a univariate structure of the GPS-Symptoms, with all symptom items exhibiting moderate to high loadings on the underlying factor and the solution accounting for 63.6% and 48.1% of the total variance in study 1 and study 2, respectively, and the univariate model fit indices being <i>X<sup>2</sup></i>(112) <i>=</i> 282.349, <i>p</i> <i><</i> .001, CFI = . 947, SRMR = .039, RMSEA = .040 [90% CI: 0.34-0.045], ECVI = .376 [90% CI: 0.33-.43]. All risk factors were significantly related to each of the GPS-Symptoms. Regression analyses revealed that gender and risk factors significantly predicted GPS-Symptoms.<b>Conclusion:</b> The current study provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of the Greek GPS as a valid and reliable tool for assessing transdiagnostic symptoms following trauma exposure.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 17(1)
Western University (CA), University of Nicosia (CY), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group (NL), Children's Hospital Agia Sophia (GR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.