Abstract DP284: Impact of Statin Initiation and Resumption Following Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The use of statins following intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is controversial. Previous studies have reported inconsistent effects on recurrent ICH, mortality, and functional recovery due to variability among clinicians. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on the safety and efficacy of statins after ICH, including subgroup analysis of resumption versus initiation, as prior research often does not distinguish between the two. We hypothesize that statin initiation is equally safe but potentially more efficacious than resumption, due to statins’ pleiotropic benefits in this population. Methods: A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023466282). Searches used free-text and MeSH terms in MEDLINE (1946-2024), Cochrane Library (1996-2024), and EMBASE (1980-2024). Studies examining safety and efficacy of statin resumption or initiation post-ICH were included. Seven reviewer teams screened 19,716 titles/abstracts and 63 full-texts. Risk of bias was assessed by ROB2 for clinical trials and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. GRADE analysis secondarily assessed certainty of key outcomes. Results: Twenty-three articles were included. For short-term mortality (≤90 days), statin initiation was associated with significant benefit (OR: 0.15, CI: 0.11-0.20, p<0.00001, I 2 =0%), and statin resumption also demonstrated benefit but to a lesser comparative extent (OR: 0.32, CI: 0.18–0.55, p<0.0001). For long-term mortality (>90 days to 1 year), statin initiation showed a reduction in long-term mortality with an OR of 0.45 (CI: 0.33-0.61, p<0.00001, I 2 =86%) and statin resumption also demonstrated benefit but to a lesser comparative extent (OR 0.65, CI: 0.46-0.92, p=0.0145). Discussion: Statin initiation and resumption post-ICH reduce short- and long-term mortality, with initiation showing more pronounced effects. GRADE analysis revealed low certainty due to limitations including predominance of non-randomized studies and heterogeneity. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that statin therapy following ICH may reduce mortality and recurrent ICH risk, with more pronounced effects observed for statin initiation compared to statin resumption. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials, such as that of the ongoing SATURN Trial, is needed to confirm these findings and optimize statin use in patients with ICH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp284
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract DP284: Impact of Statin Initiation and Resumption Following Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

T Kass-Hout, Julian Carrion Penagos, Osama Siddiqui, S Thind et al.
Stroke
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Abstract DP284: Impact of Statin Initiation and Resumption Following Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

T Kass-Hout, Julian Carrion Penagos, Osama Siddiqui, S Thind, James Ernest Siegler, Sachin Kothari, S Prabhakaran, R Morsi, Archit Baskaran, Olivia Kozel, M. Brewster Smith, Paulina Lis, Sammy Allaw, J. Nugent, Taraf Jaro, Pranay Vadapally, Saicharan Mandadi, Sasvat Chigurupati, Rushabh Shah, Harsh Desai
article en

Abstract

Background: The use of statins following intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is controversial. Previous studies have reported inconsistent effects on recurrent ICH, mortality, and functional recovery due to variability among clinicians. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on the safety and efficacy of statins after ICH, including subgroup analysis of resumption versus initiation, as prior research often does not distinguish between the two. We hypothesize that statin initiation is equally safe but potentially more efficacious than resumption, due to statins’ pleiotropic benefits in this population. Methods: A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023466282). Searches used free-text and MeSH terms in MEDLINE (1946-2024), Cochrane Library (1996-2024), and EMBASE (1980-2024). Studies examining safety and efficacy of statin resumption or initiation post-ICH were included. Seven reviewer teams screened 19,716 titles/abstracts and 63 full-texts. Risk of bias was assessed by ROB2 for clinical trials and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. GRADE analysis secondarily assessed certainty of key outcomes. Results: Twenty-three articles were included. For short-term mortality (≤90 days), statin initiation was associated with significant benefit (OR: 0.15, CI: 0.11-0.20, p<0.00001, I 2 =0%), and statin resumption also demonstrated benefit but to a lesser comparative extent (OR: 0.32, CI: 0.18–0.55, p<0.0001). For long-term mortality (>90 days to 1 year), statin initiation showed a reduction in long-term mortality with an OR of 0.45 (CI: 0.33-0.61, p<0.00001, I 2 =86%) and statin resumption also demonstrated benefit but to a lesser comparative extent (OR 0.65, CI: 0.46-0.92, p=0.0145). Discussion: Statin initiation and resumption post-ICH reduce short- and long-term mortality, with initiation showing more pronounced effects. GRADE analysis revealed low certainty due to limitations including predominance of non-randomized studies and heterogeneity. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that statin therapy following ICH may reduce mortality and recurrent ICH risk, with more pronounced effects observed for statin initiation compared to statin resumption. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials, such as that of the ongoing SATURN Trial, is needed to confirm these findings and optimize statin use in patients with ICH.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Geisinger Medical Center (US), NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), University of North Dakota (US), University of Minnesota System (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Chicago (US), Aurora West Allis Medical Center (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.