Sex Differences in Imaging for Structural Heart Disease: What is Normal for Women?

The accessibility of advanced imaging techniques has led to the exponential growth of transcatheter valve and structural interventions. The prevalence of valve disease in women is increasing in both developed and developing countries. Despite this increase in disease burden in women, optimal imaging indices for referral are understudied and underused in both research and clinical settings, resulting in later referral for intervention, suboptimal risk prediction and arbitrary procedural and device selection. Available published clinical trials are deficient in adequate sex-specific enrolment, resulting in a paucity of evidence to guide refined valve-related management in female patients. Thus, data referenced in current guidelines scarcely outline sex-specific recommendations with reference to optimal selection criteria, timing for referral and optimal procedural strategy and follow-up for this group of patients. This review summarises the available literature, focusing on disparities in imaging in women with valvular heart disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2024.27
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Imaging for Structural Heart Disease: What is Normal for Women?

Rowa H Attar
Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Sex Differences in Imaging for Structural Heart Disease: What is Normal for Women?

Rowa H Attar
article en

Abstract

The accessibility of advanced imaging techniques has led to the exponential growth of transcatheter valve and structural interventions. The prevalence of valve disease in women is increasing in both developed and developing countries. Despite this increase in disease burden in women, optimal imaging indices for referral are understudied and underused in both research and clinical settings, resulting in later referral for intervention, suboptimal risk prediction and arbitrary procedural and device selection. Available published clinical trials are deficient in adequate sex-specific enrolment, resulting in a paucity of evidence to guide refined valve-related management in female patients. Thus, data referenced in current guidelines scarcely outline sex-specific recommendations with reference to optimal selection criteria, timing for referral and optimal procedural strategy and follow-up for this group of patients. This review summarises the available literature, focusing on disparities in imaging in women with valvular heart disease.

Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research ResourcesVol. 21
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sex Differences in Imaging for Structural Heart Disease: What is Normal for Women? — Rowa H Attar · Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS