Assessing the regulatory gaps in the Electricity Act 2023 through the Imo State electricity crisis

The enactment of Nigeria’s Electricity Act 2023 represents a paradigm shift from a centralized to a decentralized model of electricity governance, aiming to empower States and catalyse investment. However, this legislative ambition has been critically tested in practice. This study employs a qualitative, desktop research methodology to conduct a critical policy analysis, assessing the regulatory gaps within the Electricity Act 2023 through the empirical lens of the Imo State electricity crisis. Guided by Institutional Theory, the research investigates how ambiguities in the Act have fostered regulatory conflict and how the absence of clear investor-entry frameworks has precipitated infrastructure disputes. Thematic and content analysis of primary legal documents, official regulatory reports, and verified media documentation reveals that the Act contains significant institutional voids. Specifically, the findings indicate that the lack of clearly delineated jurisdictional boundaries between federal and state regulators created a fertile ground for overlapping mandates and institutional rivalry between the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) and the Imo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (ISERC). Furthermore, the study establishes that the Act’s failure to provide structured guidelines on market entry sequencing, asset transfer, and pre-construction certification directly contributed to chaotic investment, confrontational infrastructure development, and the coercive seizure of assets. The study concludes that the Imo State crisis is a direct manifestation of these legislative deficiencies, demonstrating that decentralization without meticulous legal precision can exacerbate, rather than resolve, sectoral conflicts. The study therefore recommends targeted amendments to the Electricity Act 2023 to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and the issuance of a comprehensive regulatory order to establish a transparent and conflict-sensitive investor-entry framework, which are essential preconditions for achieving the Act’s stated goals of a stable, competitive, and investment-driven electricity market in Nigeria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18412927
Primary Topic
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the regulatory gaps in the Electricity Act 2023 through the Imo State electricity crisis

ONIBIYO Ezekiel Rotimi, OBASA Ayodele Babajide, ADESUYI Olutayo Muyiwa, VINCI Fadeyi Oyetunji et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
article

Assessing the regulatory gaps in the Electricity Act 2023 through the Imo State electricity crisis

ONIBIYO Ezekiel Rotimi, OBASA Ayodele Babajide, ADESUYI Olutayo Muyiwa, VINCI Fadeyi Oyetunji, ZAMANI Andrew
article en

Abstract

The enactment of Nigeria’s Electricity Act 2023 represents a paradigm shift from a centralized to a decentralized model of electricity governance, aiming to empower States and catalyse investment. However, this legislative ambition has been critically tested in practice. This study employs a qualitative, desktop research methodology to conduct a critical policy analysis, assessing the regulatory gaps within the Electricity Act 2023 through the empirical lens of the Imo State electricity crisis. Guided by Institutional Theory, the research investigates how ambiguities in the Act have fostered regulatory conflict and how the absence of clear investor-entry frameworks has precipitated infrastructure disputes. Thematic and content analysis of primary legal documents, official regulatory reports, and verified media documentation reveals that the Act contains significant institutional voids. Specifically, the findings indicate that the lack of clearly delineated jurisdictional boundaries between federal and state regulators created a fertile ground for overlapping mandates and institutional rivalry between the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) and the Imo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (ISERC). Furthermore, the study establishes that the Act’s failure to provide structured guidelines on market entry sequencing, asset transfer, and pre-construction certification directly contributed to chaotic investment, confrontational infrastructure development, and the coercive seizure of assets. The study concludes that the Imo State crisis is a direct manifestation of these legislative deficiencies, demonstrating that decentralization without meticulous legal precision can exacerbate, rather than resolve, sectoral conflicts. The study therefore recommends targeted amendments to the Electricity Act 2023 to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and the issuance of a comprehensive regulatory order to establish a transparent and conflict-sensitive investor-entry framework, which are essential preconditions for achieving the Act’s stated goals of a stable, competitive, and investment-driven electricity market in Nigeria.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Liverpool (GB), United States Institute of Peace (US), Nasarawa State University (NG), University of Abuja (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.