Does Prolonged Preservation of Blastocysts Affect the Implantation and Live Birth Rate? A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Cryopreservation technology used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) has significantly improved live birth rates by enabling multiple embryo transfers with frozen embryos from a single ovarian stimulation cycle. However, there is conflicting data on the effect of prolonged cryopreservation of human blastocysts. <b>Methods:</b> This Danish nationwide cohort study includes all frozen embryo transfers (FETs) from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2019. Biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births were analyzed based on blastocyst storage time. Blastocyst storage time was stratified into five groups, ≤3 month, 4-6 months, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, and ≥25 months, with the shortest (≤3 months) as the reference. We also examined the risk of preterm birth, small and large for gestational age (SGA and LGA), and congenital malformations among live-born children. Multivariable analysis was used to estimate the odd ratios of the reproductive outcomes, accounting for potential confounders. <b>Results:</b> We identified 7042 women with 12,599 FETs. Characteristics of women at embryo transfer did not vary significantly by storage time, except for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), which increased from 2.6% in the reference group to 6.7% in the ≥25-month group. The clinical pregnancy rate was 35.7%. Blastocyst storage time did not significantly affect biochemical pregnancy rates, with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.80-1.11) to 0.96 (95% CI: 0.82-1.12) for the 13-24-month and ≥25-month groups, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rates also did not decrease with storage time (aOR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.82-1.13) for ≥25 months. The live birth rate was 28.6%, with no significant decrease during storage (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06). However, the risk of LGA was slightly, but non-significantly, increased (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.84-2.42) in the ≥25-month group, whereas the aOR of SGA and congenital malformations was not increased. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our data indicates that storing blastocysts for a period of 25 months does not significantly affect pregnancy chances following assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031072
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Prolonged Preservation of Blastocysts Affect the Implantation and Live Birth Rate? A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Study

Riis Jølving L, Tilde Eskildsen, Jens Fedder, Michael Due Larsen
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Does Prolonged Preservation of Blastocysts Affect the Implantation and Live Birth Rate? A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Study

Riis Jølving L, Tilde Eskildsen, Jens Fedder, Michael Due Larsen
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Cryopreservation technology used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) has significantly improved live birth rates by enabling multiple embryo transfers with frozen embryos from a single ovarian stimulation cycle. However, there is conflicting data on the effect of prolonged cryopreservation of human blastocysts. <b>Methods:</b> This Danish nationwide cohort study includes all frozen embryo transfers (FETs) from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2019. Biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births were analyzed based on blastocyst storage time. Blastocyst storage time was stratified into five groups, ≤3 month, 4-6 months, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, and ≥25 months, with the shortest (≤3 months) as the reference. We also examined the risk of preterm birth, small and large for gestational age (SGA and LGA), and congenital malformations among live-born children. Multivariable analysis was used to estimate the odd ratios of the reproductive outcomes, accounting for potential confounders. <b>Results:</b> We identified 7042 women with 12,599 FETs. Characteristics of women at embryo transfer did not vary significantly by storage time, except for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), which increased from 2.6% in the reference group to 6.7% in the ≥25-month group. The clinical pregnancy rate was 35.7%. Blastocyst storage time did not significantly affect biochemical pregnancy rates, with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.80-1.11) to 0.96 (95% CI: 0.82-1.12) for the 13-24-month and ≥25-month groups, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rates also did not decrease with storage time (aOR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.82-1.13) for ≥25 months. The live birth rate was 28.6%, with no significant decrease during storage (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06). However, the risk of LGA was slightly, but non-significantly, increased (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.84-2.42) in the ≥25-month group, whereas the aOR of SGA and congenital malformations was not increased. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our data indicates that storing blastocysts for a period of 25 months does not significantly affect pregnancy chances following assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(3)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Odense University Hospital (DK), Regional Hospital Horsens (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.