Multiple Interest Holder Perspectives of the True Grit SCI Residential Program: A Mixed Methods Program Evaluation

Young adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) face significant challenges during the transition to adulthood, including barriers to independence, community participation, and psychosocial adjustment (Ingimarsdóttir et al., 2023; Zebracki et al., 2010). Current rehabilitation models in the United States prioritize short-term physical recovery and offer limited support for the developmental and contextual needs that shape long-term outcomes after SCI, particularly during transitions from inpatient rehabilitation to the community (Anderson et al., 2024; Bryden & Gran, 2024). Community-based programs may help address these gaps, though few have been rigorously evaluated using implementation science frameworks that attend to health equity, contextual influences, and sustainability (Barclay et al., 2020; Fort et al., 2023). The purpose of this mixed methods study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, and implementation of the 2025 True Grit SCI residential program, a community-based, week-long residential intervention designed to support transition-age youth (16-21) with SCI. Guided by Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 2004) and informed by the RE-AIM and PRISM frameworks (Glasgow et al., 2022; McCreight et al., 2019), this multi-phase mixed methods program evaluation examined outcomes and implementation from multiple interest holder perspectives, including young adults with SCI, family care partners, and program staff. Reach findings highlighted the heterogeneity of participants’ demographic, injury-related, and health-related social needs. Quantitative findings demonstrated improvements in goal attainment and functional independence following program participation, while changes in resilience scores were not statistically significant. Qualitative findings, however, revealed perceived gains in confidence, self-efficacy, coping, and readiness to engage in daily life and community activities. Peer mentorship, goal-directed practice, and immersive residential experiences emerged as mechanisms supporting these outcomes, alongside implementation strengths and areas for refinement relevant to sustainability and equitable scalability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Published
2026-05-15
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Interest Holder Perspectives of the True Grit SCI Residential Program: A Mixed Methods Program Evaluation

Keara McNair
Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Multiple Interest Holder Perspectives of the True Grit SCI Residential Program: A Mixed Methods Program Evaluation

Keara McNair
article en

Abstract

Young adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) face significant challenges during the transition to adulthood, including barriers to independence, community participation, and psychosocial adjustment (Ingimarsdóttir et al., 2023; Zebracki et al., 2010). Current rehabilitation models in the United States prioritize short-term physical recovery and offer limited support for the developmental and contextual needs that shape long-term outcomes after SCI, particularly during transitions from inpatient rehabilitation to the community (Anderson et al., 2024; Bryden & Gran, 2024). Community-based programs may help address these gaps, though few have been rigorously evaluated using implementation science frameworks that attend to health equity, contextual influences, and sustainability (Barclay et al., 2020; Fort et al., 2023). The purpose of this mixed methods study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, and implementation of the 2025 True Grit SCI residential program, a community-based, week-long residential intervention designed to support transition-age youth (16-21) with SCI. Guided by Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 2004) and informed by the RE-AIM and PRISM frameworks (Glasgow et al., 2022; McCreight et al., 2019), this multi-phase mixed methods program evaluation examined outcomes and implementation from multiple interest holder perspectives, including young adults with SCI, family care partners, and program staff. Reach findings highlighted the heterogeneity of participants’ demographic, injury-related, and health-related social needs. Quantitative findings demonstrated improvements in goal attainment and functional independence following program participation, while changes in resilience scores were not statistically significant. Qualitative findings, however, revealed perceived gains in confidence, self-efficacy, coping, and readiness to engage in daily life and community activities. Peer mentorship, goal-directed practice, and immersive residential experiences emerged as mechanisms supporting these outcomes, alongside implementation strengths and areas for refinement relevant to sustainability and equitable scalability.

Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiple Interest Holder Perspectives of the True Grit SCI Residential Program: A Mixed Methods Program Evaluation — Keara McNair · Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS