Comparative assessment of chemical looping assisted biomass gasification for H2 production: A Thermochemical, Exergy, and Environmental Perspective

This study conducts a comparative simulation of chemical looping-assisted biomass gasification for hydrogen-rich syngas production using Aspen Plus and HYSYS. Three biomass types (wood, industrial bark of Picea abies , Norway spruce), gasifying agents (steam, air), and oxygen carriers (Fe 2 O 3 , FeTiO 3 ) were assessed under eight cases. Steam gasification significantly enhanced H 2 yield and efficiency, while air gasification led to higher CO 2 emissions. Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses highlight steam-based configurations as superior, confirming their promise for efficient, low-carbon hydrogen production.Bark-based configurations (Cases 5–8) show higher efficiencies (38.5–39.15%) than wood-based systems (31.24–31.82%) despite the lower heating value of bark, while steam-based chemical looping results in lower GWP, reaching minimum values of about 6130 kg CO 2 -eq/h. Techno-economic analysis indicates similar capital costs across all cases (∼11.27–11.32 million USD), with operating costs governing the hydrogen production cost, which varies between 0.90 and 1.08 USD/kg H 2 and is lowest for Fe 2 O 3 -based systems. The novelty of this work lies in the systematic comparison of steam- and air-based chemical looping gasification for underexplored biomass feedstocks under identical operating conditions, supported by integrated energy, exergy, environmental, and techno-economic analyses, highlighting industrial bark as a promising feedstock for low-carbon hydrogen production. • Aspen Plus–HYSYS simulations reveal efficient chemical looping biomass gasification for H 2 • Steam gasification outperforms air, enhancing H 2 yield, efficiency, and CO 2 reduction • Industrial bark achieves highest energy efficiency (38.5–39.15%) despite lower LHV • FeTiO 3 oxygen carrier shows superior redox stability under steam gasification • Lowest H 2 cost (∼0.90 USD/kg) achieved with Fe 2 O 3 -based chemical looping systems

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2026.101336
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of chemical looping assisted biomass gasification for H2 production: A Thermochemical, Exergy, and Environmental Perspective

Rakib bin Nasir, Souman Rudra, Tae Jin Kang
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

Comparative assessment of chemical looping assisted biomass gasification for H2 production: A Thermochemical, Exergy, and Environmental Perspective

Rakib bin Nasir, Souman Rudra, Tae Jin Kang
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative simulation of chemical looping-assisted biomass gasification for hydrogen-rich syngas production using Aspen Plus and HYSYS. Three biomass types (wood, industrial bark of Picea abies , Norway spruce), gasifying agents (steam, air), and oxygen carriers (Fe 2 O 3 , FeTiO 3 ) were assessed under eight cases. Steam gasification significantly enhanced H 2 yield and efficiency, while air gasification led to higher CO 2 emissions. Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses highlight steam-based configurations as superior, confirming their promise for efficient, low-carbon hydrogen production.Bark-based configurations (Cases 5–8) show higher efficiencies (38.5–39.15%) than wood-based systems (31.24–31.82%) despite the lower heating value of bark, while steam-based chemical looping results in lower GWP, reaching minimum values of about 6130 kg CO 2 -eq/h. Techno-economic analysis indicates similar capital costs across all cases (∼11.27–11.32 million USD), with operating costs governing the hydrogen production cost, which varies between 0.90 and 1.08 USD/kg H 2 and is lowest for Fe 2 O 3 -based systems. The novelty of this work lies in the systematic comparison of steam- and air-based chemical looping gasification for underexplored biomass feedstocks under identical operating conditions, supported by integrated energy, exergy, environmental, and techno-economic analyses, highlighting industrial bark as a promising feedstock for low-carbon hydrogen production. • Aspen Plus–HYSYS simulations reveal efficient chemical looping biomass gasification for H 2 • Steam gasification outperforms air, enhancing H 2 yield, efficiency, and CO 2 reduction • Industrial bark achieves highest energy efficiency (38.5–39.15%) despite lower LHV • FeTiO 3 oxygen carrier shows superior redox stability under steam gasification • Lowest H 2 cost (∼0.90 USD/kg) achieved with Fe 2 O 3 -based chemical looping systems

Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental EngineeringVol. 13
University of Agder (NO), Institute for Advanced Engineering (KR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.