Younger women with esophageal carcinoma exhibit improved prognosis after esophagectomy: a single-center, high-volume cohort study

The prognostic significance of sex and age-sex in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether the sex or age-sex factor influences the prognosis of patients with EC after esophagectomy. The data were sourced from an original database, which includes data on patients with EC who had undergone esophagectomy between 2012 and 2016 at a high-volume cancer center. The cut-off age in our study was 55 years. Based on age and sex, the patients were categorized into the following four groups: Group A, comprising women aged ˂ 55 years; Group B, women aged ≥ 55 years, Group C, men aged ˂ 55 years; and Group D, men aged ≥ 55 years. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors. A total of 1576 patients was included. The 5-year OS rates for groups A, B, C, and D were 59.0%, 53.2%, 42.4%, and 45.4%, respectively, with statistically significant differences between them (P < 0.001). The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age-sex groups, adjuvant therapy, and pTNM stage were independent prognostic factors. Following PSM, the results demonstrated that younger women with EC had a significantly better prognosis than did patients in other age and sex cohorts (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.368, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.203–0.666). Compared with other patients, younger women with EC had a significantly better prognosis after esophagectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15619-w
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Younger women with esophageal carcinoma exhibit improved prognosis after esophagectomy: a single-center, high-volume cohort study

Jianhua Fu, Long Hao, Yue Hu, Hui Yu et al.
BMC Cancer
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Younger women with esophageal carcinoma exhibit improved prognosis after esophagectomy: a single-center, high-volume cohort study

Jianhua Fu, Long Hao, Yue Hu, Hui Yu, Tiehua Rong, Longgao Liu, Peng Lin, Xu Zhang, Xiaodong Su
article en

Abstract

The prognostic significance of sex and age-sex in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether the sex or age-sex factor influences the prognosis of patients with EC after esophagectomy. The data were sourced from an original database, which includes data on patients with EC who had undergone esophagectomy between 2012 and 2016 at a high-volume cancer center. The cut-off age in our study was 55 years. Based on age and sex, the patients were categorized into the following four groups: Group A, comprising women aged ˂ 55 years; Group B, women aged ≥ 55 years, Group C, men aged ˂ 55 years; and Group D, men aged ≥ 55 years. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors. A total of 1576 patients was included. The 5-year OS rates for groups A, B, C, and D were 59.0%, 53.2%, 42.4%, and 45.4%, respectively, with statistically significant differences between them (P < 0.001). The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age-sex groups, adjuvant therapy, and pTNM stage were independent prognostic factors. Following PSM, the results demonstrated that younger women with EC had a significantly better prognosis than did patients in other age and sex cohorts (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.368, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.203–0.666). Compared with other patients, younger women with EC had a significantly better prognosis after esophagectomy.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.