Chinese ethnic minority book classification by large language models within CLC

Purpose This study evaluates the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) in classifying Chinese ethic minority books under the scheme of Chinese Library Classification. Design/methodology/approach A test collection of Chinese ethnic minority bibliographic records was constructed, and prompt engineering was used to compare the classification performance of DeepSeek-v3 and ChatGPT-4o under two input scenarios: “title + abstract” and “title only.” By designing evaluation metrics that include accuracy, granularity and error-type analysis, this study systematically evaluates the performance differences between the models, diagnoses the causes of errors and proposes improvement strategies. Findings Experimental results show both models performed well in the broad category classification of Chinese ethnic minority books, with DeepSeek-v3 exceeding 80% accuracy. Incorporating abstracts further improved accuracy and prompted longer, more detailed classification codes. However, accuracy declined for both as classification codes grew more specific. DeepSeek-v3 significantly outperformed ChatGPT-4o, achieving an overall accuracy of 40.78% and 33.50% with and without abstracts, respectively, while ChatGPT-4o remained below 6%. On the basis of classification error analysis, this study proposes improvements in classification system design, model capability enhancement and human–artificial intelligence (AI) collaboration to guide practical improvements in organizing ethnic minority resources. Originality/value Combining librarianship, ethnography and artificial intelligence, this study is the first to compare the classification ability of different large-language models for Chinese ethnic minority books. It reveals cultural limitations in knowledge organization systems, identifies the “capability threshold” of LLMs in cultural context processing and establishes an empirical basis for developing culturally-aware AI governance frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Library
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/el-04-2025-0161
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese ethnic minority book classification by large language models within CLC

Yiqian Guo, Junzhi Jia, Wenjing Gao, Hui Xu
The Electronic Library
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

Chinese ethnic minority book classification by large language models within CLC

Yiqian Guo, Junzhi Jia, Wenjing Gao, Hui Xu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluates the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) in classifying Chinese ethic minority books under the scheme of Chinese Library Classification. Design/methodology/approach A test collection of Chinese ethnic minority bibliographic records was constructed, and prompt engineering was used to compare the classification performance of DeepSeek-v3 and ChatGPT-4o under two input scenarios: “title + abstract” and “title only.” By designing evaluation metrics that include accuracy, granularity and error-type analysis, this study systematically evaluates the performance differences between the models, diagnoses the causes of errors and proposes improvement strategies. Findings Experimental results show both models performed well in the broad category classification of Chinese ethnic minority books, with DeepSeek-v3 exceeding 80% accuracy. Incorporating abstracts further improved accuracy and prompted longer, more detailed classification codes. However, accuracy declined for both as classification codes grew more specific. DeepSeek-v3 significantly outperformed ChatGPT-4o, achieving an overall accuracy of 40.78% and 33.50% with and without abstracts, respectively, while ChatGPT-4o remained below 6%. On the basis of classification error analysis, this study proposes improvements in classification system design, model capability enhancement and human–artificial intelligence (AI) collaboration to guide practical improvements in organizing ethnic minority resources. Originality/value Combining librarianship, ethnography and artificial intelligence, this study is the first to compare the classification ability of different large-language models for Chinese ethnic minority books. It reveals cultural limitations in knowledge organization systems, identifies the “capability threshold” of LLMs in cultural context processing and establishes an empirical basis for developing culturally-aware AI governance frameworks.

The Electronic Library
Jiangsu Police Officer College (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.