Gaps in large language model awareness, usage, and perceptions in the United States: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to benefit users in both their work and personal lives, but which groups are quickest to adopt them? To investigate awareness, usage, and perceptions of LLMs among US adults across socio-demographic groups-and to track changes over time-we administered a two-wave survey using a nationally representative, probability-based online panel of 12,224 US residents. Across two survey waves spanning 1 year, we observed marked gaps in usage: groups more likely to use LLMs included men, younger adults, those with college education and higher incomes, individuals in more analytical occupations (e.g. STEM), Democratic-leaning respondents, and those with above-median cognitive ability, internet literacy, and openness to experience. These usage gaps do not appear to be declining and, in many cases, seem to be widening over time. Our analyses indicate that these disparities are associated with differences in both access-related factors (e.g. income, occupation, digital skills) and individual traits and preferences (e.g. openness to experience, political orientation). Overall, our data provide a dynamic picture of the rapidly evolving exposure to, adoption of, and attitudes toward LLMs in the US population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag007
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps in large language model awareness, usage, and perceptions in the United States: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey

Nathanael J. Fast, Jimmy Narang, Marco Angrisani, Juliana Schroeder et al.
PNAS Nexus
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Gaps in large language model awareness, usage, and perceptions in the United States: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey

Nathanael J. Fast, Jimmy Narang, Marco Angrisani, Juliana Schroeder, Maria Casanova
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to benefit users in both their work and personal lives, but which groups are quickest to adopt them? To investigate awareness, usage, and perceptions of LLMs among US adults across socio-demographic groups-and to track changes over time-we administered a two-wave survey using a nationally representative, probability-based online panel of 12,224 US residents. Across two survey waves spanning 1 year, we observed marked gaps in usage: groups more likely to use LLMs included men, younger adults, those with college education and higher incomes, individuals in more analytical occupations (e.g. STEM), Democratic-leaning respondents, and those with above-median cognitive ability, internet literacy, and openness to experience. These usage gaps do not appear to be declining and, in many cases, seem to be widening over time. Our analyses indicate that these disparities are associated with differences in both access-related factors (e.g. income, occupation, digital skills) and individual traits and preferences (e.g. openness to experience, political orientation). Overall, our data provide a dynamic picture of the rapidly evolving exposure to, adoption of, and attitudes toward LLMs in the US population.

PNAS NexusVol. 5(2)
University of Southern California (US), California State University, Fullerton (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.