Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates

Abstract This paper evaluates the impact of tax rebates on luxury durables, using Thailand's 2011 car tax rebate as a case study. Utilising a stochastic dynamic model with heterogeneous agents, where cars serve as both luxury goods and illiquid assets, the study finds that the policy effectively boosted consumption by targeting households with a high propensity to spend. However, it was regressive, primarily benefiting high‐income households and leading to prolonged negative effects on household spending and saving. Additionally, the policy caused second‐hand car prices to drop. This enabled lower‐income households to purchase used cars at lower costs, but further prolonged and deepened cuts in non‐durable spending and savings. Using the estimated parameters and the shocks to the interest rate in the policy experiment, the simulated short‐run elasticity of intertemporal substitution for Thailand is low – typically between 0 and 0.1. Wealthier and older households increase spending in response to the rate increase, whereas poorer and younger households tend to boost saving instead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fiscal Studies
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70016
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates

Tanisa Tawichsri
Fiscal Studies
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates

Tanisa Tawichsri
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper evaluates the impact of tax rebates on luxury durables, using Thailand's 2011 car tax rebate as a case study. Utilising a stochastic dynamic model with heterogeneous agents, where cars serve as both luxury goods and illiquid assets, the study finds that the policy effectively boosted consumption by targeting households with a high propensity to spend. However, it was regressive, primarily benefiting high‐income households and leading to prolonged negative effects on household spending and saving. Additionally, the policy caused second‐hand car prices to drop. This enabled lower‐income households to purchase used cars at lower costs, but further prolonged and deepened cuts in non‐durable spending and savings. Using the estimated parameters and the shocks to the interest rate in the policy experiment, the simulated short‐run elasticity of intertemporal substitution for Thailand is low – typically between 0 and 0.1. Wealthier and older households increase spending in response to the rate increase, whereas poorer and younger households tend to boost saving instead.

Fiscal Studies
Institute for Economic Research (SI)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates — Tanisa Tawichsri · Fiscal Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS