Question-answering processes in reading multiple texts in a second language: Evidence from eye tracking and think-aloud protocols

We studied Japanese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ cognitive processes when reading two texts and answering intratext or intertext questions, a format that demands attention toward discrete pieces of information across texts. In Experiment 1, 38 Japanese undergraduate and graduate students read 16 pairs of short texts and answered comprehension questions with four options each. Their eye movements were recorded, which was followed by post-reading interviews. Experiment 2 involved a think-aloud protocol study with 30 Japanese EFL learners. We found that cognitive processes in multiple-text reading largely overlapped across the question types. However, the intertext questions led participants to read more evenly, avoiding reliance on specific answer-related sentences. Questions identifying similarities between texts prompted deeper engagement and utilization of test-taking strategies compared to those detecting differences. The question-answering processes were consistent regardless of whether the participants answered each question correctly. However, those who responded inaccurately tended to frequently return to the texts. Through multiple rounds of data collection, we found that the question answering processes involved in multiple-text reading in a second language were consistent regardless of question type, but intertext questions were effective for eliciting readers’ knowledge of the text structure, one of the higher-level strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Testing
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322251406888
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Question-answering processes in reading multiple texts in a second language: Evidence from eye tracking and think-aloud protocols

Haruka Shimizu, Yuko Hijikata, Ryuya Komuro, Yuji Ushiro et al.
Language Testing
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Question-answering processes in reading multiple texts in a second language: Evidence from eye tracking and think-aloud protocols

Haruka Shimizu, Yuko Hijikata, Ryuya Komuro, Yuji Ushiro, Yuko Hoshino, Tomoko Ogiso, Keiya TANDO, Chikako Hanawa, Ryo Mizugaki
article en

Abstract

We studied Japanese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ cognitive processes when reading two texts and answering intratext or intertext questions, a format that demands attention toward discrete pieces of information across texts. In Experiment 1, 38 Japanese undergraduate and graduate students read 16 pairs of short texts and answered comprehension questions with four options each. Their eye movements were recorded, which was followed by post-reading interviews. Experiment 2 involved a think-aloud protocol study with 30 Japanese EFL learners. We found that cognitive processes in multiple-text reading largely overlapped across the question types. However, the intertext questions led participants to read more evenly, avoiding reliance on specific answer-related sentences. Questions identifying similarities between texts prompted deeper engagement and utilization of test-taking strategies compared to those detecting differences. The question-answering processes were consistent regardless of whether the participants answered each question correctly. However, those who responded inaccurately tended to frequently return to the texts. Through multiple rounds of data collection, we found that the question answering processes involved in multiple-text reading in a second language were consistent regardless of question type, but intertext questions were effective for eliciting readers’ knowledge of the text structure, one of the higher-level strategies.

Language Testing
University of Tsukuba (JP), Chiba University (JP), International University of Japan (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Tohoku Gakuin University (JP), University of Toyama (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.