Assessing carbon farming potential in Victoria, Australia: A statewide perspective

This study evaluates the potential for carbon farming across Victoria, Australia, using a spatial multi-criteria suitability mapping framework grounded in seven key biophysical criteria. Suitability scores were generated at 90 m resolution and classified into four zones using the Jenks natural breaks method. The results classified 17.3 % of the state as the Highest Potential (HstP), 27.7 % as High Potential (HiP), 38.9 % as Moderate Potential (MP), and 16.1 % as Low Potential (LP) zones. To link suitability with mitigation outcomes, statewide carbon sequestration was estimated under different land adoption scenarios, with uncertainty quantified using Latin Hypercube Sampling (n = 10,000). Median annual sequestration potential for the state ranged from 2.28 Mt CO 2 yr −1 under conservative adoption to 31.16 Mt CO 2 yr −1 under ambitious adoption. Under the ambitious scenario, the 5th-95th percentile range extended from 8.16 to 59.31 Mt, highlighting both uncertainty and the potential for very high abatement under favourable conditions. While the HstP and HiP zones deliver the highest per-hectare returns, the MP zone provides the greatest overall contribution due to its larger extent. The framework provides a transparent, scalable tool for prioritising carbon farming investments, highlighting both opportunities and constraints. It offers practical guidance for policymakers, investors, and land managers to direct resources to areas with the highest potential for sustainable climate mitigation and ecological restoration. • Spatial multi-criteria suitability mapping to assess carbon farming potential across Victoria, Australia. • Holistic method, underpinned by 7 fundamental biophysical criteria including ecological feasibility. • Priority mapping and sequestration estimates support transparent, robust policy and investment decisions. • Analysis of abandoned mines as potential carbon farming sites, aligning climate mitigation with land rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.147675
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing carbon farming potential in Victoria, Australia: A statewide perspective

Soma Giri, Peter M. Bach, Mohan Yellishetty
Journal of Cleaner Production
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Assessing carbon farming potential in Victoria, Australia: A statewide perspective

Soma Giri, Peter M. Bach, Mohan Yellishetty
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the potential for carbon farming across Victoria, Australia, using a spatial multi-criteria suitability mapping framework grounded in seven key biophysical criteria. Suitability scores were generated at 90 m resolution and classified into four zones using the Jenks natural breaks method. The results classified 17.3 % of the state as the Highest Potential (HstP), 27.7 % as High Potential (HiP), 38.9 % as Moderate Potential (MP), and 16.1 % as Low Potential (LP) zones. To link suitability with mitigation outcomes, statewide carbon sequestration was estimated under different land adoption scenarios, with uncertainty quantified using Latin Hypercube Sampling (n = 10,000). Median annual sequestration potential for the state ranged from 2.28 Mt CO 2 yr −1 under conservative adoption to 31.16 Mt CO 2 yr −1 under ambitious adoption. Under the ambitious scenario, the 5th-95th percentile range extended from 8.16 to 59.31 Mt, highlighting both uncertainty and the potential for very high abatement under favourable conditions. While the HstP and HiP zones deliver the highest per-hectare returns, the MP zone provides the greatest overall contribution due to its larger extent. The framework provides a transparent, scalable tool for prioritising carbon farming investments, highlighting both opportunities and constraints. It offers practical guidance for policymakers, investors, and land managers to direct resources to areas with the highest potential for sustainable climate mitigation and ecological restoration. • Spatial multi-criteria suitability mapping to assess carbon farming potential across Victoria, Australia. • Holistic method, underpinned by 7 fundamental biophysical criteria including ecological feasibility. • Priority mapping and sequestration estimates support transparent, robust policy and investment decisions. • Analysis of abandoned mines as potential carbon farming sites, aligning climate mitigation with land rehabilitation.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 543
Monash University (AU), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.