Stereotype threat effects on deaf and hard-of-hearing college students’ mathematics performance

This study examined whether stereotype threat degrades deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) college students' math performance. The DHH participants self-assigned their social identity as "deaf" or "hard of hearing" irrespective of audiological assessment. Social identity is central to experiencing stereotype threat and being deaf or hard of hearing may activate negative biases which trigger a stereotype threat that impacts test performance. A sample of college students (216 deaf, 128 hard of hearing, 152 hearing) were randomly assigned to either a stereotype threat or no-threat test condition and tested on arithmetic, modular arithmetic, and quantitative Graduate Record Examination-type math problems. The deaf and hard-of-hearing participants tested under the stereotype threat condition underperformed compared to those under the no-threat condition. Further exploratory analyses demonstrated that female participants underperformed male participants and African American/Black DHH participants underperformed White DHH participants. This double-threat jeopardy finding of multiple marginalized identities is consistent with the minority stress model. Overall, results are consistent with previous research in which a social identity is linked to a negative stereotype and both the stereotype and linked identity impact performance. This study demonstrated that deaf and hard of hearing are social constructs, and the results provide empirical support for the social model of disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jdsade/enaf088
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stereotype threat effects on deaf and hard-of-hearing college students’ mathematics performance

Ronald R. Kelly, Jessica Contreras, Jeremy P. Jamieson, Gerald P. Berent et al.
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Stereotype threat effects on deaf and hard-of-hearing college students’ mathematics performance

Ronald R. Kelly, Jessica Contreras, Jeremy P. Jamieson, Gerald P. Berent, Susan Post Rizzo, Peter C Hauser
article en

Abstract

This study examined whether stereotype threat degrades deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) college students' math performance. The DHH participants self-assigned their social identity as "deaf" or "hard of hearing" irrespective of audiological assessment. Social identity is central to experiencing stereotype threat and being deaf or hard of hearing may activate negative biases which trigger a stereotype threat that impacts test performance. A sample of college students (216 deaf, 128 hard of hearing, 152 hearing) were randomly assigned to either a stereotype threat or no-threat test condition and tested on arithmetic, modular arithmetic, and quantitative Graduate Record Examination-type math problems. The deaf and hard-of-hearing participants tested under the stereotype threat condition underperformed compared to those under the no-threat condition. Further exploratory analyses demonstrated that female participants underperformed male participants and African American/Black DHH participants underperformed White DHH participants. This double-threat jeopardy finding of multiple marginalized identities is consistent with the minority stress model. Overall, results are consistent with previous research in which a social identity is linked to a negative stereotype and both the stereotype and linked identity impact performance. This study demonstrated that deaf and hard of hearing are social constructs, and the results provide empirical support for the social model of disability.

The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of Rochester (US), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.