Informed Consent for Research Participation During Space Exploration: Ethical Issues

While informed consent is widely recognized as a cornerstone of ethical research with human participants, applying this principle to space exploration research creates some unique challenges and dilemmas. In this article, we examine ethical issues related to informed consent for participation in space exploration research and offer some suggestions for policy development and further investigation. We argue that: (1) informed consent for space exploration research should be required, but exceptions can be justified for research involving public records, de-identified medical records, secondary use of de-identified, biospecimens or data, emergency medical research, and research critical to mission success or crew safety; (2) organizations that conduct space exploration research should take steps to minimize the potential for undue influence by, for example, ensuring that informed consent discussions will be private and that information about research participation will be kept confidential; (3) prospective spaceflight participants should be provided with information about research activities or other types of data and specimen collection (such as quality assurance) that will take place; and (4) since existing laws and regulations do not apply to most of the research activities conducted by private companies, space companies should give serious thought to developing guidelines for the protection of human research participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70088
Primary Topic
Spaceflight effects on biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informed Consent for Research Participation During Space Exploration: Ethical Issues

Mark Shelhamer, Paul Root Wolpe, David B Resnik, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
Bioethics
Spaceflight effects on biology
article

Informed Consent for Research Participation During Space Exploration: Ethical Issues

Mark Shelhamer, Paul Root Wolpe, David B Resnik, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
article en

Abstract

While informed consent is widely recognized as a cornerstone of ethical research with human participants, applying this principle to space exploration research creates some unique challenges and dilemmas. In this article, we examine ethical issues related to informed consent for participation in space exploration research and offer some suggestions for policy development and further investigation. We argue that: (1) informed consent for space exploration research should be required, but exceptions can be justified for research involving public records, de-identified medical records, secondary use of de-identified, biospecimens or data, emergency medical research, and research critical to mission success or crew safety; (2) organizations that conduct space exploration research should take steps to minimize the potential for undue influence by, for example, ensuring that informed consent discussions will be private and that information about research participation will be kept confidential; (3) prospective spaceflight participants should be provided with information about research activities or other types of data and specimen collection (such as quality assurance) that will take place; and (4) since existing laws and regulations do not apply to most of the research activities conducted by private companies, space companies should give serious thought to developing guidelines for the protection of human research participants.

Bioethics
Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Spaceflight effects on biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.