Ischemic stroke versus hemorrhagic stroke – A comparative study on the outcome of stroke survivors attending a comprehensive stroke center of a tertiary care hospital
Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare the long-term effects of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS) using the stroke impact assessment questionnaire (SIAQ), which is beneficial in assessing stroke outcomes in a culturally appropriate manner. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted among stroke survivors attending a comprehensive stroke center for review, was the data source. Sociodemographic factors, including clinical data, were collected, and SIAQ and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were used for evaluating disability. Results: Out of 130 subjects, 112 had AIS and 18 had HS. Initial disability was higher among HS patients ( P = 0.048). However, mRS scores were similar at follow-up in both groups ( P = 0.640). SIAQ scores did not significantly differ between AIS and HS patients ( P = 0.177) across its eight domains. A correlation was observed between the SIAQ motor domain and mRS score at follow-up ( r = 0.845, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Outcomes, as measured by mRS and SIAQ, do not differ between AIS and HS patients. The motor domain of SIAQ correlated with mRS scores.
Authors
- Amrutha Vijayan
- Albin Varghese
- Akhila Rajan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-4696)
- Thomas Iype (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-9869)
- Saraswati Vivek
- Abhiram Krishna
Institutions
- Government of Kerala (IN)
- Government Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
- Published
- 2026-01-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_348_2025
- Primary Topic
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00