Crossing borders, building bridges: A reflective case of interdisciplinary PhD co-supervision in health sciences and education

This article offers a reflective account of co-supervising a doctoral study that drew on elements of Health Sciences and Education to explore interdisciplinary supervision. Rather than uniting entire disciplines, the collaboration brought together specific epistemological and methodological traditions from both fields, grounded in the lived experience of an interdisciplinary doctoral journey. The focus is not the doctoral thesis per se, but the supervisory process and how interdisciplinary practice reshapes research design, supervisory relationships, and student development. Rather than offering a generic account, the article draws on situated experience to provide practical insights into supervision practice, examination challenges, and institutional dynamics. A central tension emerged between institutional commitments to interdisciplinarity and the persistence of disciplinary expectations. The study highlights the challenges of navigating methodological dissonance, sustaining coherence in co-supervision across paradigms, and managing assessment processes that often default to monodisciplinary standards. It underscores the need for better support for both students and supervisors engaged in cross-border research. Ultimately, the article calls for more responsive supervision models and institutional cultures that recognise and accommodate the complexity of interdisciplinary doctoral journeys. Contribution: This article contributes to ongoing debates on interdisciplinary doctoral supervision by offering a grounded, practice-based reflection on how academic structures and supervision models shape knowledge-making across disciplines. It emphasises reflexivity, dialogical engagement, and institutional responsiveness as key enablers of epistemic hybridity, and encourages closer attention to how supervision practices can evolve to support complexity, fluidity, and collaboration in doctoral education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transformation in Higher Education
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v11i0.638
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crossing borders, building bridges: A reflective case of interdisciplinary PhD co-supervision in health sciences and education

Rowena Naidoo, Michael A. Samuel
1 citations
Transformation in Higher Education
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
46.02
article

Crossing borders, building bridges: A reflective case of interdisciplinary PhD co-supervision in health sciences and education

Rowena Naidoo, Michael A. Samuel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article offers a reflective account of co-supervising a doctoral study that drew on elements of Health Sciences and Education to explore interdisciplinary supervision. Rather than uniting entire disciplines, the collaboration brought together specific epistemological and methodological traditions from both fields, grounded in the lived experience of an interdisciplinary doctoral journey. The focus is not the doctoral thesis per se, but the supervisory process and how interdisciplinary practice reshapes research design, supervisory relationships, and student development. Rather than offering a generic account, the article draws on situated experience to provide practical insights into supervision practice, examination challenges, and institutional dynamics. A central tension emerged between institutional commitments to interdisciplinarity and the persistence of disciplinary expectations. The study highlights the challenges of navigating methodological dissonance, sustaining coherence in co-supervision across paradigms, and managing assessment processes that often default to monodisciplinary standards. It underscores the need for better support for both students and supervisors engaged in cross-border research. Ultimately, the article calls for more responsive supervision models and institutional cultures that recognise and accommodate the complexity of interdisciplinary doctoral journeys. Contribution: This article contributes to ongoing debates on interdisciplinary doctoral supervision by offering a grounded, practice-based reflection on how academic structures and supervision models shape knowledge-making across disciplines. It emphasises reflexivity, dialogical engagement, and institutional responsiveness as key enablers of epistemic hybridity, and encourages closer attention to how supervision practices can evolve to support complexity, fluidity, and collaboration in doctoral education.

Transformation in Higher EducationVol. 11(0)
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
46.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.