Comparative Analysis of Filter Methods for Gene Selection

Gene expression data presents significant challenges due to their high dimensionality; effective gene selection methods are needed to obtain accurate analysis and biomarker discovery. In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive comparative study using nine filter-based gene selection techniques: Information Gain, Mutual Information, Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS), Relief-F, T-Test, Wilcoxon, Chi2, Pearson correlation, and Gini index. A breast cancer microarray dataset was used to evaluate these methods based on their classification accuracy, computational efficiency, and stability of the selected gene subsets. Most methods achieve high predictive accuracy and perfect stability but differ in their computational costs. This study aims to provide practical insights for choosing appropriate filtering methods based on their balance performance and efficiency in analyzing gene expression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
مجلة جامعة الزيتونة
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35778/jazu.i56.a648
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Filter Methods for Gene Selection

Abdelhamid Elwaer, Abdeladeem Dreder
مجلة جامعة الزيتونة
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Comparative Analysis of Filter Methods for Gene Selection

Abdelhamid Elwaer, Abdeladeem Dreder
article en

Abstract

Gene expression data presents significant challenges due to their high dimensionality; effective gene selection methods are needed to obtain accurate analysis and biomarker discovery. In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive comparative study using nine filter-based gene selection techniques: Information Gain, Mutual Information, Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS), Relief-F, T-Test, Wilcoxon, Chi2, Pearson correlation, and Gini index. A breast cancer microarray dataset was used to evaluate these methods based on their classification accuracy, computational efficiency, and stability of the selected gene subsets. Most methods achieve high predictive accuracy and perfect stability but differ in their computational costs. This study aims to provide practical insights for choosing appropriate filtering methods based on their balance performance and efficiency in analyzing gene expression.

مجلة جامعة الزيتونة(56)
University of Tripoli (LY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.