Interoperability to Improve Science-Based Decision Making: Adapting a Risk Analysis Framework to Improve Translational Environmental Health Science

The protection of human and ecological health has become more challenging because of the myriad of human and climate stressors, and the sustainability of our social, economic, and environmental systems would be enhanced by further defensible risk assessment. There are scientific, technological, and cultural challenges to interoperability, bridging the necessary disciplines and integrating data from the genome to globe. Interoperability makes possible the use and reuse of data and modeling approaches and is a contemporary and rapidly progressing area advancing toxicology and exposure science. We present a coherent vision of human and ecological risk assessment, including the types of information and modeling science to create knowledge and apply it for improved decision-making. We focus on science-based decision-making, emphasizing decisions where science is the primary or sole driver, as in human toxicology and ecological risk assessment. This contrasts with decision-making where science has a minor role, if at all, in weighing decision options. We also examine the barriers that exist in the creation and application of systems thinking. We identify: the (1) needs and challenges for the application of a systems approach to informing decisions; (2) case studies that illustrate informatics needs for 21st-century science-based decision-making; and (3) recommendations on how to progress towards a systems approach to informing decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15030574
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interoperability to Improve Science-Based Decision Making: Adapting a Risk Analysis Framework to Improve Translational Environmental Health Science

Matthew C. Harwell, Pierre D. Glynn, John M. Johnston, Bruce K. Hope et al.
Electronics
Risk Perception and Management
article

Interoperability to Improve Science-Based Decision Making: Adapting a Risk Analysis Framework to Improve Translational Environmental Health Science

Matthew C. Harwell, Pierre D. Glynn, John M. Johnston, Bruce K. Hope, Edward Perkins, Katherine von Stackelberg
article en

Abstract

The protection of human and ecological health has become more challenging because of the myriad of human and climate stressors, and the sustainability of our social, economic, and environmental systems would be enhanced by further defensible risk assessment. There are scientific, technological, and cultural challenges to interoperability, bridging the necessary disciplines and integrating data from the genome to globe. Interoperability makes possible the use and reuse of data and modeling approaches and is a contemporary and rapidly progressing area advancing toxicology and exposure science. We present a coherent vision of human and ecological risk assessment, including the types of information and modeling science to create knowledge and apply it for improved decision-making. We focus on science-based decision-making, emphasizing decisions where science is the primary or sole driver, as in human toxicology and ecological risk assessment. This contrasts with decision-making where science has a minor role, if at all, in weighing decision options. We also examine the barriers that exist in the creation and application of systems thinking. We identify: the (1) needs and challenges for the application of a systems approach to informing decisions; (2) case studies that illustrate informatics needs for 21st-century science-based decision-making; and (3) recommendations on how to progress towards a systems approach to informing decisions.

ElectronicsVol. 15(3)
Harvard University (US), Outcomes Research Consortium (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), National Center for Environmental Assessment (EPA) (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.