The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies

Policy formulation in contemporary governments is a dynamic process influenced by the interplay of ideas, interests, and institutions. This study examines the intersection of three dynamics that provide unique policy results at the subnational level, with a comparative emphasis on U.S. and Indian states. This study utilizes historical institutionalism and the many streams framework to analyze how political actors articulate policy ideas, rally interests, and manoeuvre within institutional limitations to achieve reform. This analysis contends that state policy outcomes in healthcare and environmental policy cannot be comprehensively understood through interest-based or structural explanations alone. They arise from the interaction of conceptual frameworks, organized interests, and institutional structures that delineate political opportunities. The research enhances the comprehension of policy development within intricate governance frameworks, providing both theoretical and practical insights for academics and policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18407161
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
article en

Abstract

Policy formulation in contemporary governments is a dynamic process influenced by the interplay of ideas, interests, and institutions. This study examines the intersection of three dynamics that provide unique policy results at the subnational level, with a comparative emphasis on U.S. and Indian states. This study utilizes historical institutionalism and the many streams framework to analyze how political actors articulate policy ideas, rally interests, and manoeuvre within institutional limitations to achieve reform. This analysis contends that state policy outcomes in healthcare and environmental policy cannot be comprehensively understood through interest-based or structural explanations alone. They arise from the interaction of conceptual frameworks, organized interests, and institutional structures that delineate political opportunities. The research enhances the comprehension of policy development within intricate governance frameworks, providing both theoretical and practical insights for academics and policymakers.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Leading University (BD), Discovery Centre (CA), Legal Aid New South Wales (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.